ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
A deep learning algorithm for the detection of aortic dissection on non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography via the identification and segmentation of the true and false lumens of the aorta.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Radiomic analysis of abdominal non-contrast CT for identifying aortic syndrome in emergency patients.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- Artificial Intelligence in Adult Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery: Real-World Deployments and Outcomes.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Performance of image-based deep learning models for aortic dissection segmentation and diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Rapid bedside multimodal ultrasound screening for acute type A aortic dissection: a perspective.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- New Insights into Molecular Mechanisms and Radiomics in Non-Contrast CT for Aortic Dissection: A Case Report and Literature Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a diagnostic model for thoracic aortic dissection based on radiomics derived from non-enhanced computed tomography imaging.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- An innovative bimodal computed tomography data-driven deep learning model for predicting aortic dissection: a multi-center study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in aortic CT angiography: current applications and future perspectives.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Automated Detection and Differentiation of Stanford Type A and Type B Aortic Dissections in CTA Scans Using Deep Learning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Aortic dissection is a life-threatening clinical emergency, but it is often missed and misdiagnosed due to the limitations of diagnostic technology. In this study, we developed a deep learning-based algorithm for identifying the true and false lumens in the aorta on non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography (NCE-CT) scans and to ascertain the presence of aortic dissection. Additionally, we compared the diagnostic performance of this algorithm with that of radiologists in detecting aortic dissection. Methods: We included 320 patients with suspected acute aortic syndrome from three centers (Beijing Anzhen Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, and Xiangya Hospital of Central South University) between May 2020 and May 2022 in this retrospective study. All patients underwent simultaneous NCE-CT and contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT). The cohort comprised 160 patients with aortic dissection and 160 without aortic dissection. A deep learning algorithm, three-dimensional (3D) full-resolution U-Net, was continuously trained and refined to segment the true and false lumens of the aorta to determine the presence of aortic dissection. The algorithm's efficacy in detecting dissections was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, including the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. Furthermore, a comparative analysis of the diagnostic capabilities between our algorithm and three radiologists was conducted. Results: In diagnosing aortic dissection using NCE-CT images, the developed algorithm demonstrated an accuracy of 93.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 89.8-98.3%], a sensitivity of 91.6% (95% CI: 86.7-95.8%), and a specificity of 95.6% (95% CI: 91.2-99.3%). In contrast, the radiologists achieved an accuracy of 88.8% (95% CI: 83.5-94.1%), a sensitivity of 90.6% (95% CI: 83.5-94.1%), and a specificity of 94.1% (95% CI: 72.9-97.6%). There was no significant difference between the algorithm's performance and radiologists' mean performance in accuracy, sensitivity, or specificity (P>0.05). Conclusions: The algorithm proficiently segments the true and false lumens in aortic NCE-CT images, exhibiting diagnostic capabilities comparable to those of radiologists in detecting aortic dissection. This suggests that the algorithm could reduce misdiagnoses in clinical practice, thereby enhancing patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.