Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39429578›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024

A deep learning algorithm for the detection of aortic dissection on non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography via the identification and segmentation of the true and false lumens of the aorta.

Zhangbo Cheng, Lei Zhao, Jun Yan, Hongbo Zhang, Shengmei Lin, Lei Yin, Changli Peng, Xiaohai Ma, Guoxi Xie, Lizhong Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zhangbo ChengDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8768-0771
Lei ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jun YanDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fujian Provincial Clinical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Hongbo ZhangDepartment of Interventional Diagnosis and Treatment, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Shengmei LinDepartment of Radiology, Fujian Provincial Clinical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Lei YinDepartment of Radiology, Fujian Provincial Clinical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Changli PengDepartment of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xiaohai MaDepartment of Interventional Diagnosis and Treatment, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Guoxi XieDepartment of Biomedical Engineering of Basic Medical School, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Lizhong SunDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Aortic dissection is a life-threatening clinical emergency, but it is often missed and misdiagnosed due to the limitations of diagnostic technology. In this study, we developed a deep learning-based algorithm for identifying the true and false lumens in the aorta on non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography (NCE-CT) scans and to ascertain the presence of aortic dissection. Additionally, we compared the diagnostic performance of this algorithm with that of radiologists in detecting aortic dissection. Methods: We included 320 patients with suspected acute aortic syndrome from three centers (Beijing Anzhen Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, and Xiangya Hospital of Central South University) between May 2020 and May 2022 in this retrospective study. All patients underwent simultaneous NCE-CT and contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT). The cohort comprised 160 patients with aortic dissection and 160 without aortic dissection. A deep learning algorithm, three-dimensional (3D) full-resolution U-Net, was continuously trained and refined to segment the true and false lumens of the aorta to determine the presence of aortic dissection. The algorithm's efficacy in detecting dissections was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, including the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. Furthermore, a comparative analysis of the diagnostic capabilities between our algorithm and three radiologists was conducted. Results: In diagnosing aortic dissection using NCE-CT images, the developed algorithm demonstrated an accuracy of 93.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 89.8-98.3%], a sensitivity of 91.6% (95% CI: 86.7-95.8%), and a specificity of 95.6% (95% CI: 91.2-99.3%). In contrast, the radiologists achieved an accuracy of 88.8% (95% CI: 83.5-94.1%), a sensitivity of 90.6% (95% CI: 83.5-94.1%), and a specificity of 94.1% (95% CI: 72.9-97.6%). There was no significant difference between the algorithm's performance and radiologists' mean performance in accuracy, sensitivity, or specificity (P>0.05). Conclusions: The algorithm proficiently segments the true and false lumens in aortic NCE-CT images, exhibiting diagnostic capabilities comparable to those of radiologists in detecting aortic dissection. This suggests that the algorithm could reduce misdiagnoses in clinical practice, thereby enhancing patient care.

Indexed as

Aortic dissectiondeep learning algorithmnon-contrast-enhanced computed tomography (NCE-CT)

Identifiers

PMID39429578
PMCPMC11485366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.