Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39429571›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024

Multiparameter computed tomography (CT) radiomics signature fusion-based model for the preoperative prediction of clear cell renal cell carcinoma nuclear grade: a multicenter development and external validation study.

Yingjie Xv, Zongjie Wei, Fajin Lv, Qing Jiang, Haoming Guo, Yineng Zheng, Xuan Zhang, Mingzhao Xiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yingjie Xv *Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Zongjie Wei *Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Fajin LvDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Qing JiangDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Haoming GuoDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yineng ZhengDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xuan ZhangDepartment of Urology, Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Mingzhao XiaoDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The preoperative prediction of the pathological nuclear grade of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) is crucial for clinical decision making. However, radiomics features from one or two computed tomography (CT) phases are required to predict the CCRCC grade, which reduces the predictive performance and generalizability of this method. We aimed to develop and externally validate a multiparameter CT radiomics-based model for predicting the World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology (WHO/ISUP) grade of CCRCC. Methods: A total of 500 CCRCC patients at The First, Second, and Yongchuan Hospitals of Chongqing Medical University between January 2016 and May 2022 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into the training set (n=268), internal testing set (n=115), and two external testing sets (testing set 1, n=62; testing set 2, n=55). Radiomics features were extracted from multi-phase CT images, and radiomics signatures (RSs) were created by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. In addition, a clinical model was developed. A combined model was also established that integrated the RSs with the clinical factors, and was visualized via a nomogram. The performance of the established model was assessed using area under the curve (AUC) values, a calibration curve analysis, and a decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: Among the four RSs and the clinical model, the RS-Triphasic had the best predictive performance with AUCs of 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.85-0.91] and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.74-0.95) in the training and testing sets, respectively, and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.72-0.93) and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.71-0.93) in external testing sets 1 and 2. Integrating the RS-Triphasic, RS-corticomedullary phase (CMP), RS-nephrographic phase (NP), RS-non-contrast phase (NCP) with the clinical risk factors, a combined model was established with AUCs of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89-0.94), 0.86 (95% CI: 0.76-0.95), 0.84 (95% CI: 0.73-0.95), and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.70-0.94) for the training, internal testing, and external testing sets 1 and 2, respectively. The DCA indicated that the nomogram had a greater overall net benefit than the clinical and radiomics models. Conclusions: The multiparameter CT RS fusion-based model had high accuracy in differentiating between high- and low-grade CCRCC preoperatively. Thus, it has great potential as a useful tool for personalized treatment planning and clinical decision making for CCRCC patients.

Indexed as

clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC)Computed tomography (CT)multiparameter fusion radiomics modelpathological nuclear graderadiomics

Identifiers

PMID39429571
PMCPMC11485359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.