ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
Predictors of nasolacrimal duct intubation failure for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction: a computed tomography-dacryocystography (CT-DCG) study.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Developmental anatomy of the lacrimal sac fossa and nasolacrimal canal: a CT study of paediatric patients.Eye (London, England) · 2026Observational
- Incomplete rather than complete nasolacrimal duct obstruction Is strongly associated with meibomian gland dysfunction in postmenopausal women with PANDO: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Anatomic features of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: a comparative computed tomography study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Optimizing Endo-DCR Outcomes in Traumatic Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Making a choice between nasolacrimal duct intubation and dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO) is an important issue in clinical practice. This study aimed to determine the potential lacrimal sac characteristics that could be used as predictors of unsuccessful intubation for PANDO based on computed tomography-dacryocystography (CT-DCG). Methods: In this retrospective comparative observational study, we included PANDO patients with a history of failed intubation for nasolacrimal duct obstruction as the intubation failure group and PANDO patients without a history of intubation as the control group. We analyzed the lacrimal sac height, lacrimal sac width, and obstruction site based on CT-DCG, all measured based on several reference levels on axial sections (upper, intermediate, lower level, common canaliculus level, and lowermost contrast level), which were defined according to the contrast and the bony structure. Results: A total of 114 sides of the PANDO were studied, including 36 in the intubation failure group and 78 in the control group. The intubation failure group showed a smaller lacrimal sac height (11.69±4.59 mm) and width (2.28±1.97 mm, intermediate level) than the control group (14.13±2.92, 3.32±2.02 mm, P=0.005 and 0.012, respectively). The intubation failure group had a higher obstruction site than the control group (P=0.009). Conclusions: A small lacrimal sac and high obstruction site are predictors of nasolacrimal duct intubation failure in PANDO. For PANDO patients with a small lacrimal sac or a high obstruction position, DCR is recommended as opposed to intubation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.