Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39429547›Full record

ArticleCartography and geographic information science2024

Multiple Representations in geospatial databases, the brain's spatial cells, and deep learning algorithms.

May Yuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cartography and geographic information science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

May YuanGeospatial Information Sciences, School of Economic, Political and Policy Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9006-2920

Funding

The Effects of Cognitive Map Building on the Development of Alzheimer's DiseaseR21AG069267 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI KENNEDY, KRISTEN M., YUAN, MAY · 2020 to 2021
$421k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG069267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Buttenfield (1988) pioneered research on multiple representations in the dawn of GIScience. Her efforts evoked inquiries into fundamental issues arising from the selective abstractions of infinite geographic complexity in spatial databases, cartography and application needs for varied geographic details. These fundamental issues posed ontological challenges (e.g., entity classification) and implementational complications (e.g., duplication and inconsistency) in geographic information systems (GIS). Expanding upon Buttenfield's line of research over the last three decades, this study reviewed multiple representations in spatial databases, spatial cognition, and deep learning. Initially perceived as a hindrance in GIS, multiple representations were found to offer new perspectives to encode and decipher geographic complexity. This paper commenced by acknowledging Buttenfield's pivotal contributions to multiple representations in GIScience. Subsequent discussions synthesized the literature to outline cognitive representations of space in the brain's hippocampal formation and feature representations in deep learning. By cross-referencing related concepts of multiple representations in GIScience, the brain's spatial cells, and machine learning algorithms, this review concluded that multiple representations facilitate learning geography for both humans and machines.

Indexed as

deep learningmultiple representationsspatial cellsspatial cognition

Identifiers

PMID39429547
PMCPMC11486309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.