Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39429541›Full record

ArticleObesity science & practice2024

Four-year follow-up of weight loss maintenance using electronic medical record data: The PROPEL trial.

Peter T Katzmarzyk, Emily F Mire, Ronald Horswell, San T Chu, Dachuan Zhang, Corby K Martin, Robert L Newton, John W Apolzan, Eboni G Price-Haywood, Dan Fort and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity science & practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02561221 (Promoting Successful Weight Loss in Primary Care in Louisiana), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02561221 nacompletednot on this map

Promoting Successful Weight Loss in Primary Care in Louisiana

TypeinterventionalSponsorPennington Biomedical Research CenterRan2016 to 2019Enrolled803ConditionsObesityArmsLifestyle Counseling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Peter T KatzmarzykPennington Biomedical Research Center Baton Rouge Louisiana USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9280-6022
Emily F MirePennington Biomedical Research Center Baton Rouge Louisiana USA.
Ronald HorswellPennington Biomedical Research Center Baton Rouge Louisiana USA.
San T ChuPennington Biomedical Research Center Baton Rouge Louisiana USA.
Dachuan ZhangPennington Biomedical Research Center Baton Rouge Louisiana USA.
Corby K MartinPennington Biomedical Research Center Baton Rouge Louisiana USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8125-4015
Robert L NewtonPennington Biomedical Research Center Baton Rouge Louisiana USA.
John W ApolzanPennington Biomedical Research Center Baton Rouge Louisiana USA.
Eboni G Price-HaywoodOchsner Xavier Institute for Health Equity and Research New Orleans Louisiana USA.
Dan FortDivision of Academics Ochsner Center for Outcomes Research Ochsner Health New Orleans Louisiana USA.
Thomas W CartonLouisiana Public Health Institute New Orleans Louisiana USA.
Kara D DenstelPennington Biomedical Research Center Baton Rouge Louisiana USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7161-9730
PROPEL Research Group

Funding

Tracking & Evaluation CoreU54GM104940 · NIGMS · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI Peter Todd Katzmarzyk · 2012 to 2026
$69.1M
Research BaseP30DK072476 · NIDDK · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI ROBERT A KESTERSON · 2005 to 2026
$26.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK072476NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rationale: Short-term weight loss is possible in a variety of settings. However, long-term, free-living weight loss maintenance following structured weight loss interventions remains elusive. Objective: The purpose was to study body weight trajectories over 2 years of intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) and up to 4 years of follow-up versus usual care (UC). Methods: Data were obtained from electronic medical records (EMRs) from participating clinics. Baseline (Day 0) was established as the EMR data point closest but prior to the baseline date of the trial. The sample included 111 ILI and 196 UC patients. The primary statistical analysis focused on differentiating weight loss trajectories between ILI and UC. Results: The ILI group experienced significantly greater weight loss compared with the UC group from Day 100 to Day 700, beyond which there were no significant differences. Intensive lifestyle intervention patients who maintained ≥5% and ≥10% weight loss at 24 months demonstrated significantly greater weight loss ( Conclusions: Following 24 months of active intervention, patients with ILI regained weight toward their baseline to the point where ILI versus UC differences were no longer statistically or clinically significant. However, patients in the ILI who experienced ≥5% or ≥10% weight loss at the cessation of the active intervention maintained greater weight loss at the end of the follow-up phase. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02561221.

Indexed as

dietEMRlifestyle behaviorsobesityphysical activity

Identifiers

PMID39429541
PMCPMC11490219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.