Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39429507›Full record

ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2024

National Policies to Limit Nutrients, Ingredients, or Categories of Concern in School Meals: A Global Scoping Review.

Emily A Busey, Grace Chamberlin, Kayla Mardin, Michelle Perry, Lindsey Smith Taillie, Francesca R Dillman Carpentier, Barry M Popkin

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emily A BuseyGlobal Food Research Program, Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Grace ChamberlinGlobal Food Research Program, Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Kayla MardinGlobal Food Research Program, Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Michelle PerryGlobal Food Research Program, Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Lindsey Smith TaillieGlobal Food Research Program, Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Francesca R Dillman CarpentierGlobal Food Research Program, Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Barry M PopkinGlobal Food Research Program, Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.

Funding

UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CLINICAL NUTRITION RESEARCH UNITP30DK056350 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Venkata Saroja Voruganti · 1999 to 2026
$31.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056350
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The school food environment is a key intervention point for influencing children's and adolescents' diets. As more countries establish school meal programs to provide critical nourishment to students, establishing standards for the foods served can increase the consumption of key nutrients and limit the consumption of foods that do not build health. This global scoping review explores the prevalence and basic characteristics of national policies that regulate food served through school meals across 193 countries, particularly by restricting the provision of categories, nutrients, or ingredients of nutritional concern. We gathered evidence from policy databases, grey literature, peer-reviewed literature, and primary policy documents. We included nationally mandated policies that included restrictions on categories, nutrients, or ingredients of concern served in school meals. Policies that were sub-national, voluntary, and/or did not include restrictive language were excluded from this review. Data was collected in research electronic data capture then extracted into Microsoft Excel and analyzed for policy frequency, prevalence by world region or country income group, and prevalence of certain policy characteristics. Globally, only 15% of countries were found to have a national-level policy restricting foods served through school meals in some capacity, including either nutritional or categorical restrictions. The majority of these policies were found in high-income countries, and no low-income countries had a policy meeting inclusion criteria. Policies in Latin-American and Caribbean countries limited the content of more nutrients of concern than in other regions. Although many policies included explicit guidelines to monitor implementation, few outlined mechanisms for policy enforcement. Future research should evaluate the impact of various school meal regulatory approaches, including implementation of similar policies at sub-national levels, and other elements that affect the impact of school meal programs, such as procurement, infrastructure, costs to school and to students and their families, and acceptability and consumption of foods provided.

Indexed as

childhood obesityfood policyschool food environmentschool mealsscoping reviewultra-processed foods

Identifiers

PMID39429507
PMCPMC11490762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.