Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39429497›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2024

Consulting with an embedded librarian: student perceptions on the value of required research meetings.

Susan R Franzen, Caitlin Stewart, Mallory Jallas, Joshua Newport

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Susan R Franzensrfranz@ilstu.edu, Associate Dean of Public Services and Organizational Development, Illinois State University, Normal, IL.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1389-3437
Caitlin Stewartcjstew1@ilstu.edu, Teaching and Learning Librarian, Illinois State University, Normal, IL.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0968-6351
Mallory Jallasjallas2@uis.edu, Head of Information Literacy and Academic Outreach, University of Illinois at Springfield, Springfield, IL.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4302-7137
Joshua Newportjcnewpo@ilstu.edu, Math and Science Librarian, Illinois State University, Normal, IL.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4363-4332

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This qualitative research project was undertaken to discover how students perceive the embedded librarian in their nursing class. The researchers determined how a required group research meeting was valued by students and whether that value warranted the necessary time and energy by an embedded librarian. Methods: Researchers conducted focus groups with twenty-three students from two different sections of the same nursing research methods undergraduate course. Students' responses to a series of five questions were recorded within Zoom and supplemented by handwritten notes. Data was coded by hand and patterns that emerged from the five focus groups were analyzed. Results: Participants reported overall satisfaction with the embedded librarian and students felt they benefitted from the required research meeting with the librarian, which was part of the searching assignment rubric and closely tied to the assignment itself. Conclusion: Based on the data, a required research meeting with an embedded librarian, who is familiar with the course assignments, reinforces classroom instruction, point-of-need assistance with search strategies, and the opportunity to strengthen the relationship with the librarian for future research needs.

Indexed as

Focus GroupsLibrariansAdultFemaleHumansLibraries, MedicalMaleQualitative ResearchStudents, NursingConsultationsEmbedded librarianNursing StudentsQualitative ResearchUniversity Library

Identifiers

PMID39429497
PMCPMC11486084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.