ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2024
Intraocular Pressure and Cup-to-Disc Ratio Asymmetry in Diagnosing Iris Melanoma.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unilateral Glaucoma as a Clinical Indicator of Iris and Ciliary Body Melanoma.Ocular oncology and pathology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Distinguishing an iris melanoma from an iris nevus can be challenging as few clinical features other than documented growth are helpful in making the diagnosis. In this study, we compared the presenting intraocular pressure (IOP) and cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) between affected and unaffected eyes in patients with iris melanoma and iris nevus. Patients and methods: This was a single-institution retrospective case series of patients treated for iris melanoma and iris nevus from January 2013 to October 2022. Thirty-nine subjects with iris melanoma and forty age-matched patients with iris nevus were included. We analyzed the difference in IOP, CDR, and diagnosis of glaucoma between affected and unaffected eyes in patients with iris melanoma and control iris nevus cohort. Results: The average IOP for eyes with iris melanoma and iris nevus was 18.8±6.1 mmHg and 14.6±3.5 mmHg (P<0.001), respectively. The average CDR was 0.36±0.27 and 0.24±0.14 (P=0.02), respectively. The average IOP of the contralateral unaffected eye in iris melanoma patients was 16.3±3.5 mmHg, significantly less than the affected eye (P=0.03). The average CDR of the contralateral unaffected eye in iris melanoma was 0.25±0.15, which was trending towards being less than the affected eye (P=0.05). There was no difference in the average IOP (P=0.89) or average CDR (P=0.49) between the affected and unaffected eye in patients with iris nevus. Conclusion: We demonstrate that patients with iris melanoma are more likely to have greater IOP and CDR in the affected eye compared to the unaffected eye, and a diagnosis of unilateral glaucoma than eyes with iris nevus. Patients with iris melanoma had greater IOP asymmetry between the affected and unaffected eye. Therefore, IOP and CDR asymmetry may suggest a diagnosis of iris melanoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.