ArticleCureus2024
Usefulness of Combined Advanced Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and Diffusion-Weighted MRI Over Ultrasonography in Differentiating Cancer From Benign Lesions in Dense Breasts.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiparametric MRI-derived biomarkers for preoperative prediction of recurrence and/or metastasis after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Evaluation of BI-RADS 3 Ultrasound Findings: the Frequency and Incidence of Malignant Lesions, and Tumor Size.Acta medica academica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim To evaluate the role of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in characterizing suspicious lesions in dense breasts compared to ultrasonography (USG). Materials and methods Eighty-two consecutive female patients with suspicious lesions in dense breast parenchyma showing the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting And Data System (ACR BI-RADS) c/d composition on mammography underwent USG, where 63 lesions of 63 patients were suspicious. They underwent multiparametric MRI, followed by histopathological evaluation (HPE) of the lesions. Statistical analysis was done to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of USG and MRI in lesion characterization and the combined accuracy of DCE-MRI with DWI. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis provided the cut-off for the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value. Results The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of USG were 91.7%, 63%, and 79.4%, respectively. Kinetic curve analysis on DCE-MRI showed a type I curve only in benign lesions. Malignant lesions predominantly showed a type III curve. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of DCE-MRI were 95.8%, 78.5%, and 85.7%, respectively. The optimum cut-off ADC value was 1.05x10-3 mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.