ArticleCureus2024
Clinical Significance of the Control CT Rotterdam Score Compared With the Admission CT Rotterdam Score in Patients With Isolated Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in the Intensive Care Unit.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Rotterdam scale is one of the most commonly used radiological scales for evaluating and predicting outcomes in traumatic brain injury (TBI) cases. Given the evolving nature of TBI, our study is designed to compare the Rotterdam score of computed tomography (CT) findings upon admission (Rotterdam score I) with the score after 72 hours (Rotterdam score II) of treatment in the trauma intensive care unit (ICU).
methodsA retrospective observational study was conducted on 54 patients who received intensive care treatment for isolated severe TBI over five years. We included severe TBI patients with no age restrictions who required admission to the ICU within 12 hours of the onset of trauma. An initial Rotterdam CT score was obtained via a CT head scan within four hours of the trauma, followed by a control CT head scan 72 hours after ICU admission. It was essential to have documentation on the clinical and laboratory treatment course and access to radiological CT diagnostics. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed in this study to evaluate the accuracy of diagnostic tests, such as the Rotterdam score. The ROC curves provided a graphical representation of the tests' diagnostic performance, which helped assess their effectiveness.
resultsThere was a significant difference (p < 0.001) in the diagnostic scores of CT scans upon admission (Rotterdam score I) and control CT scans after 72 hours (Rotterdam score II) in the total sample. The Rotterdam score I was notably higher, 3.6 (±0.8), in patients requiring neurosurgical intervention compared to those who did not, 2.8 (±0.9), with significance (p = 0.003). The Rotterdam score I demonstrated a substantial predictive value for unfavorable outcomes (p = 0.048), as did the Rotterdam score II after the 72-hour mark (p = 0.006).
conclusionThe control Rotterdam score 72 hours after admission predicts mortality in isolated TBI patients more significantly than the Rotterdam score determined at the patient's admission to the intensive care unit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.