Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39429343›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Analgesic Efficacy of Single-Shot Erector Spinae Block in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Cohort Study.

Wen Xuan Xu, Nancy Liu, Mella Y Kim, Xiaoyu Wu, Joobin Sattar, Kamal Kumar, Cheng Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wen Xuan XuSchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, CAN.
Nancy LiuSchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, CAN.
Mella Y KimSchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, CAN.
Xiaoyu WuSchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, CAN.
Joobin SattarAnesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, London, CAN.
Kamal KumarAnesthesiology, Western University, London, CAN.
Cheng LinAnesthesiology, Western University, London, CAN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is a minimally invasive surgical technique though effective analgesia remains a challenge. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has gained popularity due to its ease and safety of placement. In this study, we evaluated the analgesic efficacy of ESPB in patients undergoing VATS through a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study. The primary outcome is the total opioid use in the first 12 postoperative hours. Methods We used binomial logistic regression to model whether patients received ESPB as a function of age, sex, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status, and surgery type to generate a propensity score for each patient for matching. Results After screening 286 patients, 55 patients each in the ESPB and no-block groups were matched. ESPB was associated with a 1.2 mg (95% CI: -2.2 to -0.2) reduction in opioid use in IV hydromorphone equivalents when compared to no block. However, there was no reduction in the 12-hour pain score area under the curve or incidence of complications between the two groups. Conclusions ESPB was associated with a modest reduction in total opioid consumption although not a difference in pain score. While its analgesic efficacy may be limited, ESPB could be considered a component of multi-modal analgesia in VATS.

Indexed as

acute pain managementerector spinae plane block (espb)minimally invasive surgical proceduresultrasound-guided regional anesthesiavideo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (vats)

Identifiers

PMID39429343
PMCPMC11491056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.