ArticleCureus2024
Mass Screening for Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: Is It Really Relevant?
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association of the TGF-beta1 polymorphism with primary open-angle glaucoma: a case-control study.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glaucoma, one of the leading causes of blindness worldwide, poses a significant public health challenge. Despite advancements in diagnostic technologies, early detection remains a challenge. This study assesses the relevance of glaucoma screening in a population-based context. Conducted in October 2023, this retrospective study involved 434 employees at two pharmaceutical laboratory sites. The average age was 44 years, with a female-to-male ratio of 0.7. A family history of glaucoma was reported in 74 participants (17%). Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements showed that 20 participants (4.6%) had IOP above 21 mmHg, while the average IOP in the studied population was 15.5 mmHg. Glaucomatous damage to the optic nerve head was observed in 65 cases (15%). A total of 71 employees (16.5%), including 70% women, were re-examined in a hospital setting, where they underwent comprehensive ophthalmological examinations. Among them, 13 participants (18%) were diagnosed with glaucoma, representing 2.9% of the initially screened employees. This study highlights the ongoing challenge of preventing irreversible blindness due to glaucoma. Although the diagnostic approach used was effective for early detection among employees, the overall value of mass glaucoma screening remains debated. This debate is due to the disease's low prevalence, the lack of highly sensitive and specific screening tests, economic considerations, and the impact on the quality of life of those screened. Further studies are needed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and economic efficiency of various screening strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.