ReviewCureus2024
Increasing Trends of Artificial Intelligence With Robotic Process Automation in Health Care: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- PRIME 2.0: Proposed Requirements for Cardiovascular Imaging-Related Multimodal-AI Evaluation: An Updated Checklist.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2026Guideline
- Digital Transformation in Health Care: Are We on the Right Track?Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Collaborative Robotic Systems for Pre-Analytical Processing of Biological Specimens in a Medical Laboratory.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitude, awareness and perception of orthodontic residents, and orthodontists regarding robotics in the field of orthodontics: a cross-sectional study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review explores the fast-growing importance of artificial intelligence (AI) with robotic process automation (RPA) in healthcare. AI uses intelligent algorithms to analyze data, while RPA automates repetitive tasks to improve efficiency and accuracy. These technologies are swiftly revolutionizing health care by improving diagnostic precision, accelerating administrative tasks, reducing operation timing, and improving patient care. Application of these technologies requires good technical understanding, preparedness for continuous learning, and adaptability to new challenges. This review aims to provide an in-depth study of the potential applications, present implementations, challenges, and future scope of AI with RPA in healthcare. It can provide information to researchers, professionals, and decision-makers regarding the application of the technologies under consideration for better productivity, increased security and accuracy of data, cost reduction, and personalization of healthcare provided to patients. The main results are that AI and RPA can ensure greater data security, provide supporting work in administration, like scheduling appointments and medical billing, make better decisions, enable telehealth and remote patient monitoring, reduce human error, and increase overall health outcomes. This review overviews the challenges in implementing robotics technology, focusing mainly on secondary source journals, scholarly articles, and reference books. Key findings indicate that this study reveals how robotics could alleviate healthcare professionals. Further research, investment, and collaboration will be needed to enable these technologies to reach their full potential for healthcare delivery. However, challenges such as data privacy and security concerns, high implementation costs, and regulatory and ethical considerations must be addressed. The conclusion emphasizes that while these technologies are revolutionizing healthcare by increasing efficiency and personalizing patient care, ongoing research, investment, and collaboration are essential for their successful adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.