Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39429248›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in computational neuroscience2024

Decoding the application of deep learning in neuroscience: a bibliometric analysis.

Yin Li, Zilong Zhong

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yin LiNanyang Institute of Technology, Nanyang, China.
Zilong ZhongBeijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of deep learning in neuroscience holds unprecedented potential for unraveling the complex dynamics of the brain. Our bibliometric analysis, spanning from 2012 to 2023, delves into the integration of deep learning in neuroscience, shedding light on the evolutionary trends and identifying pivotal research hotspots. Through the examination of 421 articles, this study unveils a significant growth in interdisciplinary research, marked by the burgeoning application of deep learning techniques in understanding neural mechanisms and addressing neurological disorders. Central to our findings is the critical role of classification algorithms, models, and neural networks in advancing neuroscience, highlighting their efficacy in interpreting complex neural data, simulating brain functions, and translating theoretical insights into practical diagnostics and therapeutic interventions. Additionally, our analysis delineates a thematic evolution, showcasing a shift from foundational methodologies toward more specialized and nuanced approaches, particularly in areas like EEG analysis and convolutional neural networks. This evolution reflects the field's maturation and its adaptation to technological advancements. The study further emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary collaborations and the adoption of cutting-edge technologies to foster innovation in decoding the cerebral code. The current study provides a strategic roadmap for future explorations, urging the scientific community toward areas ripe for breakthrough discoveries and practical applications. This analysis not only charts the past and present landscape of deep learning in neuroscience but also illuminates pathways for future research, underscoring the transformative impact of deep learning on our understanding of the brain.

Indexed as

bibliometric analysiscomputational modelsdeep learningneural networksneuroscience

Identifiers

PMID39429248
PMCPMC11486706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.