Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39429242›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2024

Rehabilitating homonymous visual field deficits: white matter markers of recovery-stage 1 registered report.

Hanna E Willis, Matthew R Cavanaugh, Sara Ajina, Franco Pestilli, Marco Tamietto, Krystel R Huxlin, Kate E Watkins, Holly Bridge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Voxel-Based Lesion-Symptom Mapping Localizes Residual Visual Function in Hemianopia.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hanna E WillisWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5479-6169
Matthew R CavanaughFlaum Eye Institute and Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Sara AjinaWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK.
Franco PestilliDepartment of Psychology, Department of Neuroscience, Center for Perceptual Systems, Center for Learning and Memory, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712-1043, USA.
Marco TamiettoDepartment of Psychology, University of Torino, Torino 10123, Italy.
Krystel R HuxlinFlaum Eye Institute and Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7138-6156
Kate E WatkinsWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.
Holly BridgeWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8089-6198

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Damage to the primary visual cortex (V1) or its afferent white matter tracts results in loss of vision in the contralateral visual field that can present as homonymous visual field deficits. Recent evidence suggests that visual training in the blind field can partially reverse blindness at trained locations. However, the efficacy of visual training to improve vision is highly variable across subjects, and the reasons for this are poorly understood. It is likely that variance in residual functional or structural neural circuitry following the insult may underlie the variation among patients. Many patients with visual field deficits retain residual visual processing in their blind field, termed 'blindsight', despite a lack of awareness. Previous research indicates that an intact structural and functional connection between the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) and the human extrastriate visual motion-processing area (hMT+) is necessary for blindsight to occur. We therefore predict that changes in this white matter pathway will underlie improvements in motion discrimination training. Twenty stroke survivors with unilateral, homonymous field defects from retro-geniculate brain lesions will complete 6 months of motion discrimination training at home. Visual training will involve performing two daily sessions of a motion discrimination task, at two non-overlapping locations in the blind field, at least 5 days per week. Motion discrimination and integration thresholds, Humphrey perimetry and structural and diffusion-weighted MRI will be collected pre- and post-training. Changes in fractional anisotropy will be analysed in two visual tracts: (i) between the ipsilesional dLGN and hMT+ and (ii) between the ipsilesional dLGN and V1. The (non-visual) tract between the ventral posterior lateral nucleus of the thalamus (VPL) and the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) will be analysed as a control. Tractographic changes will be compared to improvements in motion discrimination and Humphrey perimetry-derived metrics. We predict that (i) improved motion discrimination performance will be directly related to increased fractional anisotropy in the pathway between ipsilesional dLGN and hMT+ and (ii) improvements in Humphrey perimetry will be related to increased fractional anisotropy in the dLGN-V1 pathway. There should be no relationship between behavioural measures and changes in fractional anisotropy in the VPL-S1 pathway. This study has the potential to lead to greater understanding of the white matter microstructure of pathways underlying the behavioural outcomes resulting from visual training in retro-geniculate strokes. Understanding the neural mechanisms that underlie visual rehabilitation is fundamental to the development of more targeted and thus effective treatments for this underserved patient population.

Indexed as

diffusion-weighted imagingneuroimagingstrokevisual training

Identifiers

PMID39429242
PMCPMC11487897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.