Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39429193›Full record

Trial reportClinical oral implants research2025

Does Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin Combined With Autogenous Demineralized Dentine Enhance Alveolar Ridge Preservation? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Odai Amer, Nesma Shemais, Karim Fawzy El-Sayed, Heba Ahmed Saleh, Mona Darhous

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical oral implants research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Applications of Growth Factors in Implant Dentistry.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Odai AmerOral Medicine and Periodontology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Nesma ShemaisOral Medicine and Periodontology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-9887-9807
Karim Fawzy El-SayedOral Medicine and Periodontology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-6261-3609
Heba Ahmed SalehOral and Maxillofacial Pathology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mona DarhousOral Medicine and Periodontology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe present trial evaluated the first-time application of autogenous demineralized dentin graft with injectable platelet-rich fibrin (ADDG + i-PRF) versus autogenous demineralized dentin graft (ADDG), in alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) in the maxillary aesthetic zone. MATERIAL AND

methodsTwenty-two maxillary (n = 22) non-molar teeth indicated for extraction were randomized into two groups (n = 11/group). Extracted teeth were prepared into ADDG, implanted into extraction sockets with or without i-PRF amalgamation and covered by collagen sponge. Cone-beam computed tomography scans at baseline and 6 months were compared to assess ridge-dimensional changes. Keratinized tissue width, patient satisfaction, pain score and chair time were recorded. In the course of dental implant placements at 6 months, bone core biopsies of engrafted sites were obtained and analysed histomorphometrically.

resultsReduction in ridge width was 1.71 ± 1.08 and 1.8 ± 1.35 mm, while reduction in ridge height was 1.11 ± 0.76 and 1.8 ± 0.96 mm for ADDG + i-PRF and ADDG, respectively (p > 0.05). Significant differences in keratinized tissue width reduction were notable between ADDG + i-PRF and ADDG (0.12 ± 0.34 and 0.58 ± 0.34 mm respectively; p = 0.008). Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in ADDG + i-PRF (p = 0.012). All patients in the two groups were satisfied with no differences in chair time (p > 0.05). No differences in total percentage area of newly formed bone, soft tissue or graft particles were observed between the groups (p > 0.05).

conclusionsADDG alone or in combination with i-PRF yields similar results regarding ARP clinically, quality of the formed osseous tissues, as well as patients' satisfaction. Yet, the addition of i-PRF to ADDG tends to preserve the keratinized tissue and lessen postoperative pain.

Indexed as

Alveolar Bone LossAlveolar Ridge AugmentationDentinPlatelet-Rich FibrinAdultAlveolar ProcessCone-Beam Computed TomographyDental Implantation, EndosseousFemaleHumansMaleMaxillaMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionTooth ExtractionTooth Socketalveolarautogenousdentinextractionplateletspreservation

Identifiers

PMID39429193
PMCPMC11810550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.