ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2024
Principal component analysis revisited: fast multitrait genetic evaluations with smooth convergence.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The next frontier for genomic prediction is computational.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Molecular Mass and Isoelectric Point Analysis of Cytokinin Sequences in the Wheat Genome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A cornerstone in breeding and population genetics is the genetic evaluation procedure, needed to make important decisions on population management. Multivariate mixed model analysis, in which many traits are considered jointly, utilizes genetic and environmental correlations between traits to improve the accuracy. However, the number of parameters in the multitrait model grows exponentially with the number of traits which reduces its scalability. Here, we suggest using principal component analysis to reduce the dimensions of the response variables, and then using the computed principal components as separate responses in the genetic evaluation analysis. As principal components are orthogonal to each other so that phenotypic covariance is abscent between principal components, a full multivariate analysis can be approximated by separate univariate analyses instead which should speed up computations considerably. We compared the approach to both traditional multivariate analysis and factor analytic approach in terms of computational requirement and rank lists according to predicted genetic merit on two forest tree datasets with 22 and 27 measured traits, respectively. Obtained rank lists of the top 50 individuals were in good agreement. Interestingly, the required computational time of the approach only took a few seconds without convergence issues, unlike the traditional approach which required considerably more time to run (7 and 10 h, respectively). The factor analytic approach took approximately 5-10 min. Our approach can easily handle missing data and can be used with all available linear mixed effect model softwares as it does not require any specific implementation. The approach can help to mitigate difficulties with multitrait genetic analysis in both breeding and wild populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.