ReviewHistopathology2025
4D pathology: translating dynamic epithelial tubulogenesis to prostate cancer pathology.
Review in Histopathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatial transcriptomics reveals clonal relationships between intraductal carcinoma and adjacent invasive prostate cancer.Histopathology · 2026Article
- LncRNA expression in prostate cancer: FromNon-coding RNA research · 2026Article
- Neuregulin-1 correlates to early castration-resistant prostate cancer after prostate cancer patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy.Journal of Cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Gleason score is the gold standard for grading of prostate cancer (PCa) and is assessed by assigning specific grades to different microscopical growth patterns. Aside from the Gleason grades, individual growth patterns such as cribriform architecture were recently shown to have independent prognostic value for disease outcome. PCa grading is performed on static tissue samples collected at one point in time, whereas in vivo epithelial tumour structures are dynamically invading, branching and expanding into the surrounding stroma. Due to the lack of models that are able to track human PCa microscopical developments over time, our understanding of underlying tissue dynamics is sparse. We postulate that human PCa expansion utilizes embryonic and developmental tubulogenetic pathways. The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive overview of developmental pathways of normal epithelial tubule formation, elongation, and branching, and relate those to the static microscopical PCa growth patterns observed in daily clinical practise. This study could provide a rationale for the discerned pathological interobserver variability and the clinical outcome differences between PCa growth patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.