ArticleNeurointervention2024
Inadvertent Detachment of Stent Retrievers: Report of 2 Cases.
Article in Neurointervention, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mechanical thrombectomy using a stent retriever is a widely-used technique for recanalizing occluded cerebral arteries in acute ischemic stroke. Although rare, inadvertent stent detachment has primarily been reported with earlier stent retriever designs. We present 2 cases of inadvertent stent detachment with the pRESET stent. In the first case, an elderly patient presented with right middle cerebral artery occlusion and experienced stent detachment during the second retrieval. Despite this, successful recanalization was achieved through balloon angioplasty. In the second case, an elderly patient experienced stent detachment after the third retrieval, and recanalization of the M1 segment was unsuccessful due to the inability to pass the microcatheter. The first patient had a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 3, while the second had a poor prognosis with an mRS score of 5. These cases highlight that inadvertent stent detachment can impact outcomes, and balloon angioplasty may serve as a useful salvage therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.