Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39428572›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA2025

A survey of attitudes toward and experiences with traditional Chinese medicines among people in Taiwan.

Cheng-Yu Chuang, Hui-Yu Chung, Fu-Shih Chen, Ichiro Arai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cheng-Yu ChuangGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nihon Pharmaceutical University, Saitama, Japan.
Hui-Yu ChungGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nihon Pharmaceutical University, Saitama, Japan.
Fu-Shih ChenGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nihon Pharmaceutical University, Saitama, Japan.
Ichiro AraiGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nihon Pharmaceutical University, Saitama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite numerous surveys on traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs) and their impact on people in Taiwan, only a few directly assessed the perspectives of the users and their experiences with the practice. In this study, we aimed to explore the attitudes, experiences, and understanding of TCMs, and also to identify the TCMs that are commonly preferred among people in Taiwan.

methodsWe conducted an online survey among people in Taiwan to reflect the viewpoints of the general public on TCMs in 2022. Individuals working in the medical field were excluded. Question topics included experience, impressions, access, and expectations.

resultsAccording to the results of the questionnaire survey, of the 518 participants interviewed, more than 95% had used TCMs. "Work gently" was the most common positive impression, and "Take effect slowly" was the most common negative impression. Among the over-the-counter TCMs that were taken by the participants, "Si Wu Tang," which tends to be used for treating female diseases, was the most common. The main expectations for TCMs were to improve daily health and prevent diseases. Although the participants were well informed about TCMs, there was still room for improvement. For example, 30% of the participants still did not know that TCMs might have side effects.

conclusionPeople in Taiwan who participated in the survey had a relatively positive impression of and experience with TCMs, but there were still some knowledge gaps that need to be filled with additional information. It is essential to strengthen the publicity and education about TCMs and improve the public's understanding and correct use of TCMs.

Indexed as

Medicine, Chinese TraditionalAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesTaiwanYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39428572
PMCPMC12718997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.