Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39428461›Full record

ReviewDiagnosis (Berlin, Germany)2025

Bringing team science to the ambulatory diagnostic process: how do patients and clinicians develop shared mental models?

Aubrey Samost-Williams, Eric J Thomas, Olivia Lounsbury, Scott I Tannenbaum, Eduardo Salas, Sigall K Bell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aubrey Samost-WilliamsAnesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, 12340 The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston , Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4747-461X
Eric J ThomasMedicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Olivia LounsburyPatients for Patient Safety US, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Scott I TannenbaumThe Group for Organizational Effectiveness Inc, Albany, NY, USA.
Eduardo SalasRice University, Houston, TX, USA.
Sigall K BellMedicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Research Training of Anesthesiology Physician-ScientistsT32GM135118 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI Holger K. Eltzschig, Cynthia Ju · 2022 to 2026
$1.1M
AHRQ HHS R18 HS029362NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM135118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ambulatory diagnostic process is potentially complex, resulting in faulty communication, lost information, and a lack of team coordination. Patients and families have a unique position in the ambulatory diagnostic team, holding privileged information about their clinical conditions and serving as the connecting thread across multiple healthcare encounters. While experts advocate for engaging patients as diagnostic team members, operationalizing patient engagement has been challenging. The team science literature links improved team performance with shared mental models, a concept reflecting the team's commonly held knowledge about the tasks to be done and the expertise of each team member. Despite their proven potential to improve team performance and outcomes in other settings, shared mental models remain underexplored in healthcare. In this manuscript, we review the literature on shared mental models, applying that knowledge to the ambulatory diagnostic process. We consider the role of patients in the diagnostic team and adapt the five-factor model of shared mental models to develop a framework for patient-clinician diagnostic shared mental models. We conclude with research priorities. Development, maintenance, and use of shared mental models of the diagnostic process amongst patients, families, and clinicians may increase patient/family engagement, improve diagnostic team performance, and promote diagnostic safety.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareModels, PsychologicalPatient Care TeamPatient ParticipationCommunicationHumansambulatory diagnostic safetypatient engagementshared mental modelsteamwork

Identifiers

PMID39428461
PMCPMC11839146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.