Trial reportAbdominal radiology (New York)2025
Optimized versus conventional trigger threshold for pancreatic phase image acquisition using dual-energy CT at 40-keV: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Improved visualization of pancreas and tumor boundaries using high-frequency kernels with deep-learning image reconstruction at high-strength level.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the impact of optimized trigger threshold on 40-keV pancreatic phase images acquired with a dual-energy CT (DECT) protocol.
methodsA cohort of 69 consecutive participants (median age, 72 years) undergoing a pancreatic protocol DECT examination between September to December 2021 were prospectively randomized into two protocols: conventional trigger threshold of 100 HU (Group A, n = 34) and optimized trigger threshold of 30 HU (Group B, n = 35). Pancreatic phase image acquisition was performed with fixed delay of 20 s from the trigger threshold. Two radiologists assessed the 40-keV pancreatic phase images for scan timing adequacy using a binary scale (adequate or inadequate). The proportions of these classifications were compared in the two groups using the Fisher's test.
resultsThe median times to achieve the aortic attenuation of 30 HU and 100 HU were 16.3 s and 22.3 s in Group A, respectively, and was 17.8 s for 30 HU in Group B. The median time difference from 30 HU to 100 HU was 4.5 s in Group A. The scan timing adequacies of pancreatic phase images were classified as adequate (50.0% and 74.3%) or inadequate (50.0% and 25.7%) in Group A and Group B (P = 0.049).
conclusionAn optimized trigger threshold of 30 HU allows consistent acquisition of adequate pancreatic phase images compared to the conventional trigger threshold of 100 HU for pancreatic protocol DECT at 40-keV which might lead to improved pancreatic lesion conspicuity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39428423What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.