ArticleCell proliferation2024
RETRACTION: MATN1-AS1 promotes glioma progression by functioning as ceRNA of miR-200b/c/429 to regulate CHD1 expression.
Article in Cell proliferation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction of
Authors and funding
0 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
J. Zhu , WT. Gu , and C. Yu , "MATN1-AS1 Promotes Glioma Progression by Functioning as ceRNA of miR-200b/c/429 to Regulate CHD1 Expression," Cell Proliferation 53, no. 1 (2020): e12700. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpr.12700. The above article, published online on 30 October 2019, in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), and has been retracted by agreement between the authors; the journal Deputy Editor, Yunfeng Lin; and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. The authors contacted the journal and reported that they had detected mistakes in the figures that compromised the validity of the article's results and requested a retraction. In addition, a report from a third party found duplications between Figures 2E and 2C with other articles by different authors, each of which describe different experimental conditions. Following further correspondence, the authors acknowledged these duplications and have stated that they cannot confirm the authenticity of the data. The retraction has been agreed to because the duplications of images across different articles fundamentally compromises the conclusions and results presented in the article.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.