ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2025
Quantifying population-level neural tuning functions using Ricker wavelets and the Bayesian bootstrap.
Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Social anxiety is associated with greater autonomic and visuocortical generalization of conditioned aversive responses to faces.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
- The contribution of the koniocellular visual pathway to aversive learning in human visual cortex.Journal of neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Heightened Distraction under Competition in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Changes in visuocortical engagement and oscillatory brain activity during associative learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comparing Methods for Mass Univariate Analyses of Human EEG: Empirical Data and Simulations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Competitive Cortical Prioritization Emerges for Trained Objects across the First Year of Life.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Applying Bayesian Multilevel Modeling to Single Trial Dynamics: A Demonstration in Aversive Conditioning.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExperience changes visuo-cortical tuning. In humans, re-tuning has been studied during aversive generalization learning, in which the similarity of generalization stimuli (GSs) with a conditioned threat cue (CS+) is used to quantify tuning functions. Previous work utilized pre-defined tuning shapes (generalization and sharpening patterns). This approach may constrain the ways in which re-tuning can be characterized since the tuning patterns may not match the prototypical functions. NEW
methodThe present study proposes a flexible and data-driven method for precisely quantifying changes in tuning based on the Ricker wavelet function and the Bayesian bootstrap. This method was applied to EEG and psychophysics data from an aversive generalization learning paradigm.
resultsThe Ricker wavelet model fitted the steady-state visual event potentials (ssVEP), alpha-band power, and detection accuracy data well. A Morlet wavelet function was used for comparison and fit the data better in some situations, but was more challenging to interpret. The pattern of re-tuning in the EEG data, predicted by the Ricker model, resembled the shapes of the best fitting a-priori patterns. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING
methodsAlthough the re-tuning shape modeled by the Ricker function resembled the pre-defined shapes, the Ricker approach led to greater Bayes factors and more interpretable results compared to a-priori models. The Ricker approach was more easily fit and led to more interpretable results than a Morlet wavelet model.
conclusionThis work highlights the promise of the current method for capturing the precise nature of visuo-cortical tuning, unconstrained by the implementation of a-priori models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.