Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39428077›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2025

Quantifying population-level neural tuning functions using Ricker wavelets and the Bayesian bootstrap.

Laura Ahumada, Christian Panitz, Caitlin M Traiser, Faith E Gilbert, Mingzhou Ding, Andreas Keil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Competitive Cortical Prioritization Emerges for Trained Objects across the First Year of Life.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laura AhumadaDepartment of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. Electronic address: laura.ahumadaher@ufl.edu.
Christian PanitzDepartment of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Bremen, Bremen 28359, Germany.
Caitlin M TraiserDepartment of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Faith E GilbertDepartment of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Mingzhou DingJ. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Andreas KeilDepartment of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.

Funding

Ding R01 Administrative SupplementR01MH125615 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI DING, MINGZHOU, KEIL, ANDREAS · 2021 to 2025
$2.5M
Acquisition and extinction of affective bias in perception: A single trial approaR01MH097320 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI DING, MINGZHOU, KEIL, ANDREAS · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH097320NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH125615
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExperience changes visuo-cortical tuning. In humans, re-tuning has been studied during aversive generalization learning, in which the similarity of generalization stimuli (GSs) with a conditioned threat cue (CS+) is used to quantify tuning functions. Previous work utilized pre-defined tuning shapes (generalization and sharpening patterns). This approach may constrain the ways in which re-tuning can be characterized since the tuning patterns may not match the prototypical functions. NEW

methodThe present study proposes a flexible and data-driven method for precisely quantifying changes in tuning based on the Ricker wavelet function and the Bayesian bootstrap. This method was applied to EEG and psychophysics data from an aversive generalization learning paradigm.

resultsThe Ricker wavelet model fitted the steady-state visual event potentials (ssVEP), alpha-band power, and detection accuracy data well. A Morlet wavelet function was used for comparison and fit the data better in some situations, but was more challenging to interpret. The pattern of re-tuning in the EEG data, predicted by the Ricker model, resembled the shapes of the best fitting a-priori patterns. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING

methodsAlthough the re-tuning shape modeled by the Ricker function resembled the pre-defined shapes, the Ricker approach led to greater Bayes factors and more interpretable results compared to a-priori models. The Ricker approach was more easily fit and led to more interpretable results than a Morlet wavelet model.

conclusionThis work highlights the promise of the current method for capturing the precise nature of visuo-cortical tuning, unconstrained by the implementation of a-priori models.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremElectroencephalographyWavelet AnalysisAdultAlpha RhythmBrainEvoked Potentials, VisualFemaleGeneralization, PsychologicalHumansMaleModels, NeurologicalPhotic StimulationPsychophysicsYoung AdultAversive generalization learningEEGRicker waveletSteady-state potentialsTuning functionsVisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID39428077
PMCPMC12054791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.