Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39427695›Full record

SynthesisActa tropica2024

A quantitative and systematic analysis of Anopheles stephensi bionomics and control approaches.

Tabeth Mwema, Sarah Zohdy, Mekala Sundaram, Christopher A Lepczyk, Lana Narine, Janna R Willoughby

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta tropica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Prioritizing urban water-storage containers for molecular surveillance of invasiveCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tabeth MwemaCollege of Forestry, Wildlife, and Environment, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.
Sarah ZohdyCollege of Forestry, Wildlife, and Environment, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA; US President's Malaria Initiative, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Mekala SundaramDepartment of Infectious Disease, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Christopher A LepczykCollege of Forestry, Wildlife, and Environment, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.
Lana NarineCollege of Forestry, Wildlife, and Environment, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.
Janna R WilloughbyCollege of Forestry, Wildlife, and Environment, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA. Electronic address: jwilloughby@auburn.edu.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anopheles stephensi is a mosquito endemic to South Asia and the Arabian Peninsula that has recently been detected in eight African countries, posing a significant threat to global malaria control efforts. A challenge with An. stephensi is that it requires unique surveillance and control tools when compared to other malaria vectors. Through a systematic literature review, we investigated the efficacy of trapping methods and controls for An. stephensi mosquitoes, with a focus on studies of its behavior and biology. Data from 83 articles (native range: Afghanistan, India, Iran, Iraq, Pakistan, and Qatar; invasive range: Djibouti, Ethiopia, Sri Lanka, Saudi Arabia, and Sudan) met our study inclusion criteria. Data from these studies revealed that using host-seeking animal baited traps increased the number of mosquitoes collected per trap per day in the native range when compared to host-seeking human baited traps. However, these differences were not present in data collection rate assessments from the invasive range. We also found that An. stephensi equally used a large variety of breeding habitats in the native range, but that it tended to prefer water reservoirs and wastewater in the invasive range. Finally, we found that temephos, fenthion, Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis, and Beauveri bassiana were more effective at reducing larvae in their native range compared to the approaches found in our systematic literature search, but the relative effectiveness of these approaches in the invasive range was less clear. Understanding proven historical surveillance and control approaches is essential to the advancement of invasive An. stephensi mitigation efforts, but continued investigations in the invasive range are critical to reducing the impacts of malaria morbidity and mortality.

Indexed as

AnophelesMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsAfricaAnimalsEcosystemHumansInsecticidesIntroduced SpeciesMalariaInsecticidesInvasive speciesMalaria vectorMosquito control

Identifiers

PMID39427695
PMCPMC11959532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.