ArticleGynecologic oncology2024
ATR inhibition increases reliance on PARP-mediated DNA repair revealing an improved therapeutic strategy for cervical cancer.
Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic profiling identifies actionable DNA-repair defects in a new cervical cancer model.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Phase 1 study of ceralasertib, an ATR kinase inhibitor, in combination with durvalumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic NSCLC or HNSCC.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Article
- Terpenoids: Emerging Natural Modulators for Reversing ABC Transporter-Mediated Multidrug Resistance in Cancer Chemotherapy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Rewired DDR-TGF-β-β-catenin-PD-L1 axis accelerates progression and shapes therapy in human papillomavirus-driven cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- PARPs and PARP inhibitors: molecular mechanisms and clinical applications.Molecular biomedicine · 2025Review
- Dual inhibition of ATR and PARP reverses acquired PARP inhibitor resistance in triple negative breast cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveCervical cancer results from persistent infection with high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) and the expression of E6 and E7 oncoproteins. E6 and E7 compromise the activity of p53 and Rb, the G1-S cell cycle checkpoint, and ATM-mediated DNA damage repair (DDR), which in turn increases reliance on ATR- and PARP-mediated DDR at the G2 cell cycle checkpoint. This study aimed to determine the effects of an ATR inhibitor (ATRi, AZD6738) and a PARP-inhibitor (PARPi, AZD2281) on HR-HPV+ cervical cancer cell lines.
methodsThe effects of ATRi and PARPi, alone and in combination, on metabolic viability, cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and DDR pathways in cervical cancer cell lines were evaluated in vitro, and the in vivo tumor response was evaluated using a xenograft model.
resultsCervical cancer cells were sensitive to ATRi and PARPi monotherapy. The combination therapy was only synergistic in reducing metabolic viability when exposed to ATRi first, followed by PARPi, owing to ATRi-mediated upregulation of PARP expression. Combination of ATRi and PARPi induced G2 cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. PARPi induced DNA damage and γH2AX phosphorylation, which was further increased by ATRi treatment. However, PARPi-induced Rad51 foci formation was reduced by ATRi treatment, suggesting the inhibition of homologous recombination repair. ATRi significantly reduced cervical cancer xenograft tumor growth and was not affected by simultaneous PARPi treatment at the doses studied.
conclusionsOur findings show that ATRi increased reliance on PARP for metabolic viability, the combination of ATRi and PARPi induced synthetic lethality in cervical cancer in vitro, and reduced tumor burden in vivo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.