Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39427337›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of medical education2024

Enhancing the learning experience by empowering medical students to co-create learning tools and classroom activities.

Parama Chaipackdee, Thanakrit Tanjararak, Parit Prechachaisurat, Bhranai Sammatat, Patomthan Marknui, Chalinee Monsereenusorn, Chanchai Traivaree, Wittawat Chantkran, Pasra Arnutti, Thammanoon Srisaarn and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Parama ChaipackdeePhramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand.
Thanakrit TanjararakPhramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand.
Parit PrechachaisuratPhramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand.
Bhranai SammatatPhramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand.
Patomthan MarknuiPhramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chalinee MonsereenusornDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chanchai TraivareeDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand.
Wittawat ChantkranDepartment of Pathology, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pasra ArnuttiDepartment of Biochemistry, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand.
Thammanoon SrisaarnMedical Education Unit, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand.
Ram RangsinPhramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand.
Mathirut MungthinPhramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand.
Dusit StawornMedical Education Unit, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand.
Piya RujkijyanontDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to enhance the learning experience among medical students by empowering them to co-create learning tools and classroom activities. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 10 participants from Year 2 of the new curriculum volunteering to participate in this study. Five were selected based on their diversities and empowered to design learning tools and class activities. Student satisfaction was presented as mean scores. A comparison of self-confidence scores in subjects learned before and after the class was analyzed using the paired t-test. Comparisons of multiple-choice question (MCQ) scores before and after the class between Years 2 (n = 96) and Year 3 of the previous curriculum attending inclass teaching (n = 98) were analyzed using the independent sample t-test. Results: A high level of satisfaction (M=87.5, SD=15.7%) and significant improvements in student self-confidence in subjects learned between before (M=46.4, SD=20.8%) and after (M=82.7, SD=16.9%) the class were noted (t Conclusions: Empowering medical students to co-create learning tools and class activities could positively enhance their learning experience. The result of this study addressed the importance of student empowerment with well-designed student-centered learning strategies based on their learning environment. Additional qualitative research is required to better understanding the "why" and "how" behind the findings of this study.

Indexed as

CurriculumEmpowermentStudents, MedicalCross-Sectional StudiesEducational MeasurementEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleHumansLearningMalePersonal SatisfactionProblem-Based LearningSelf Conceptempowermentlearning experiencepre-clinical studentsstudent-centered learning

Identifiers

PMID39427337
PMCPMC11687376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.