ArticleJournal of biomolecular NMR2024
Perspective: on the importance of extensive, high-quality and reliable deposition of biomolecular NMR data in the age of artificial intelligence.
Article in Journal of biomolecular NMR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The NMR Exchange Format (NEF): Specification and Applications.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- NMR data processing, visualization, analysis and structure calculation with NMRFx.Communications chemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) models are revolutionising scientific data analysis but are reliant on large training data sets. While artificial training data can be used in the context of NMR processing and data analysis methods, relating NMR parameters back to protein sequence and structure requires experimental data. In this perspective we examine what the biological NMR community needs to do, in order to store and share its data better so that we can make effective use of AI methods to further our understanding of biological molecules. We argue, first, that the community should be depositing much more of its experimental data. In particular, we should be depositing more spectra and dynamics data. Second, the NMR data deposited needs to capture the full information content required to be able to use and validate it adequately. The NMR Exchange Format (NEF) was designed several years ago to do this. The widespread adoption of NEF combined with a new proposal for dynamics data specifications come at the right time for the community to expand its deposition of data. Third, we highlight the importance of expanding and safeguarding our experimental data repository, the Biological Magnetic Resonance Data Bank (BMRB), not only in the interests of NMR spectroscopists, but biological scientists more widely. With this article we invite others in the biological NMR community to champion increased (possibly mandatory) data deposition, to get involved in designing new NEF specifications, and to advocate on behalf of the BMRB within the wider scientific community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.