Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39427229›Full record

SynthesisThe oncologist2025

Comparative efficacy and safety of talazoparib plus enzalutamide and other first-line treatments for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Elena Castro, Jenna Ellis, Samantha Craigie, Anja Haltner, Jonathan Nazari, Alexander Niyazov, Imtiaz A Samjoo

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudySystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The oncologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03395197 (A PHASE 3, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY OF TALAZOPARIB WITH ENZALUTAMIDE IN METASTATIC CASTRATION-RESISTANT PROSTATE CANCER), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03395197 phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of talazoparib with enzalutamide in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorPfizerRan2017 to 2027Enrolled1,054ConditionsmCRPCArmsTalazoparib with enzalutamide, Placebo with enzalutamide
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elena CastroHospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid 28041, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3691-6454
Jenna EllisEVERSANA™, Burlington, ON, CanadaL7N 3H8.
Samantha CraigieEVERSANA™, Burlington, ON, CanadaL7N 3H8.
Anja HaltnerEVERSANA™, Chicago, IL 60601, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9829-7791
Jonathan NazariPfizer, Inc., New York, NY 10001, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4758-7588
Alexander NiyazovPfizer, Inc., New York, NY 10001, United States.
Imtiaz A SamjooEVERSANA™, Burlington, ON, CanadaL7N 3H8.ORCID 0000-0003-1415-8055

Funding

Pfizer Inc
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTalazoparib plus enzalutamide (TALA + ENZA) has demonstrated antitumor activity in the phase 3 clinical trial (TALAPRO-2; NCT03395197) as first-line (1L) therapy in men with asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Although many active interventions are available, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving talazoparib have only been conducted to assess its efficacy and safety compared to enzalutamide. To estimate comparisons between all relevant interventions, indirect comparisons are needed.

objectiveTo estimate the comparative efficacy and safety of TALA + ENZA in 1L patients with mCRPC by conducting a systematic literature review and network meta-analyses (NMAs).

methodsDatabases were searched using Ovid, along with several gray literature sources to identify RCTs evaluating treatments in 1L mCRPC (PROSPERO registration: CRD42021283512). Feasibility assessment evaluated trial suitability for NMA inclusion and Bayesian or frequentist NMAs were conducted for evaluable efficacy and safety outcomes, respectively.

resultsThirty-three RCTs met the eligibility criteria and were feasible for NMAs. Across multiple efficacy outcomes assessed, except for overall survival (OS), TALA + ENZA was ranked the most efficacious treatment. For OS, TALA + ENZA showed the second-highest probability of being the most effective treatment; second to docetaxel 50 mg plus prednisolone 10 mg. With respect to safety outcomes, TALA + ENZA, in general, showed increased rates of hematological adverse events.

conclusionsTALA + ENZA showed favorable results across multiple efficacy endpoints, but not across hematological toxicities compared with other 1L treatments in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic mCRPC in the all-comers patient population.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsPhenylthiohydantoinProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantPyrazinesBenzamidesHumansMaleNeoplasm MetastasisNitrilesPhthalazinesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeBenzamidesenzalutamideNitrilesPhenylthiohydantoinPhthalazinesPyrazinestalazoparibmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancernetwork meta-analysisPARP inhibitorsystematic literature reviewtalazoparib

Identifiers

PMID39427229
PMCPMC11954501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.