ArticleBMC nursing2024
Development of a risk predication model for critical care needs in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage: a retrospective cohort.
Article in BMC nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt is very important to provide the correct nursing care for patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), but the level of critical care needs in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage is not clear. The purpose of this study is to establish a risk model based on the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of ICH patients, to help identify the critical care needs of ICH patients.
methodsThe clinical data of ICH patients from January 2018 to September 2023 were analyzed retrospectively. The full cohort was used to derive the clinical prediction model and the model was internally validated with bootstrapping. Discrimination and calibration were assessed using the area under curve (AUC) and the Hosmer-Lemeshow tests, respectively.
results611 patients with ICH were included for model development. 61.21% (374/611) ICH patients had received critical care interventions. The influencing factors included in the model were Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, intraventricular hemorrhage, past blood pressure control, systolic blood pressure on admission and bleeding volume. The model's goodness-of-fit was evaluated, which yielded a high area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.943, indicating a good fit. For the purpose of model validation, a cohort of 260 patients with ICH was utilized. The model demonstrated a Youden's index of 0.750, with a sensitivity of 90.56% and a specificity of 78.22%.
conclusionGCS, systolic blood pressure, intraventricular hemorrhage, bleeding volume and past blood pressure control are the main factors affecting the critical care needs of patients with ICH. This study has deduced a clinical predictive model with good discrimination and calibration to provide scoring criteria for clinical health care providers to accurately evaluate and identify the critical care needs of ICH patients, to improve the rational integration and allocation of medical resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.