Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39427210›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2024

The impact of tau-PET in a selected memory clinic cohort: rationale and design of the TAP-TAU study.

Marie R Vermeiren, Joost Somsen, Gert Luurtsema, Fransje E Reesink, Nicolaas A Verwey, Liesbeth Hempenius, Nelleke Tolboom, Geert Jan Biessels, J Matthijs Biesbroek, Meike W Vernooij and 10 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Quantitation of PET spatial extent as a potential adjunct to visual interpretation of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Marie R VermeirenAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands. m.r.vermeiren@amsterdamumc.nl.
Joost SomsenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Gert LuurtsemaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Fransje E ReesinkDepartment of Neurology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Nicolaas A VerweyDepartment of Neurology, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands.
Liesbeth HempeniusGeriatric Center, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands.
Nelleke TolboomDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Geert Jan BiesselsDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
J Matthijs BiesbroekDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Meike W VernooijDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Sophie E M Veldhuijzen van ZantenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Harro SeelaarDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Emma M CoomansAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Charlotte E TeunissenNeurochemistry Laboratory, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Afina W LemstraAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Argonde C van HartenAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Leonie N C VisserAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Wiesje M van der FlierAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Elsmarieke van de Giessen *Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Rik Ossenkoppele *Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands. r.ossenkoppele@amsterdamumc.nl.

Funding

ZonMw 10510032120003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTau-PET is a diagnostic tool with high sensitivity and specificity for discriminating Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia from other neurodegenerative disorders in well-controlled research environments. The role of tau-PET in real-world clinical practice, however, remains to be established. The aim of the TAP-TAU study is therefore to investigate the impact of tau-PET in clinical practice.

methodsTAP-TAU is a prospective, longitudinal multi-center study in 300 patients (≥ 50 years old) with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia across five Dutch memory clinics. Patients are eligible if diagnostic certainty is < 85% after routine dementia screening and if the differential diagnosis includes AD. More specifically, we will include patients who (i) are suspected of having mixed pathology (e.g., AD and vascular pathology), (ii) have an atypical clinical presentation, and/or (iii) show conflicting or inconclusive outcomes on other tests (e.g., magnetic resonance imaging or cerebrospinal fluid). Participants will undergo a [

resultsTAP-TAU has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Amsterdam UMC. The first participant is expected to be included in October 2024.

conclusionsIn TAP-TAU, we will investigate the added clinical value of tau-PET in a real-world clinical setting, including memory clinic patients with diagnostic uncertainty after routine work-up. Findings of our study may contribute to recommendations regarding which patients would benefit most from assessment with tau-PET. This study is timely in the dawning era of disease modifying treatments as an accurate etiological diagnosis becomes increasingly important.

trial registrationThis trial is registered and authorized on December 21st, 2023 in EU Clinical Trials with registration number 2023-505430-10-00.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionPositron-Emission Tomographytau ProteinsAgedAlzheimer DiseaseBiomarkersCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsProspective StudiesBiomarkerstau ProteinsAlzheimer’s diseaseDementiaPositron emission tomographyProspective studiesTau

Identifiers

PMID39427210
PMCPMC11490118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.