Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39427143›Full record

Trial reportBMC oral health2024

Effect of soft tissue volume on midfacial gingival margin alterations following immediate implant placement in the esthetic zone: a 1-year randomized clinical and volumetric trial.

Ahmed Ibrahim Aboul Fettouh, Noha Ayman Ghallab, Khaled Abdel Ghaffar, Azza Ezz Elarab, Nourhan Gamal Abdel-Aziz, Nael Adel Mina, Nesma Mohamed Shemais, Omnia Aboul Dahab

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05975515 (Effect of Soft Tissue Volume on Midfacial Gingival Margin Alterations Following Immediate Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05975515 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Soft Tissue Volume on Midfacial Gingival Margin Alterations Following Immediate Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone: A 1-Year Randomized Clinical and Volumetric Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled39ConditionsCustomized Healing Abutment Bone Grafts Connective Tissue Graft Immediate Implant PlacementArmsConnective tissue graft /Bone graft/ Customized HA
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ahmed Ibrahim Aboul FettouhFaculty of Dentistry, Misr International University, Cairo, Egypt. ahmed.abouelfotouh@miuegypt.edu.eg.
Noha Ayman GhallabFaculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Khaled Abdel GhaffarMinister of Health, Egypt and Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Azza Ezz ElarabAl-Ahram Canadian University, Cairo, Egypt and Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Nourhan Gamal Abdel-AzizMSc. Faculty of Dentistry Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. nourhan.moustafa@dentistry.cu.edu.eg.
Nael Adel MinaBDS Misr International University, Cairo, Egypt.
Nesma Mohamed ShemaisFaculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Omnia Aboul DahabFaculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current trial evaluated the midfacial gingival margin changes, volumetric, radiographic and clinical alterations 1-year following immediate implant placement with customized healing abutment (IIP + CHA) either solely, or in combination with xenograft (IIP + Bonegraft) or with connective tissue grafting (IIP + CTG) at sites with thin labial bone in the esthetic zone.

methodsThirty-nine non-restorable maxillary teeth indicated for extraction in the esthetic zone were included. Participants were randomly assigned into three equal group; IIP + Bonegraft (Control), IIP + CTG and IIP + CHA. Midfacial gingival margin changes(mm) as primary outcome, labial soft tissue contour change(mm), interdental tissue height changes and total volume(mm

resultsThe midfacial gingival margin changes demonstrated a significant difference (P ≤ 0.05) between the groups showing -0.98, -0.74 and -1.54 mm in sites treated with IIP + Bone graft, IIP + CTG and IIP + CHA respectively after1-year. While labial soft tissue contour change (mm), total volume (mm

conclusionsThis investigation suggests that the mere presence of CTG simultaneous with IIP in the anterior maxilla reduced the midfacial gingival margin alterations (mm), besides, CTG decreased the overall volume loss (mm

trial registrationThe current trial was retrospectively registered at Clinical trials.gov (ID: NCT05975515, Date: 27-July-2023).

Indexed as

Esthetics, DentalGingivaAdultBone TransplantationConnective TissueFemaleHumansImmediate Dental Implant LoadingMaleMaxillaMiddle AgedBone graftConnective tissue graftCustomized healing abutmentEsthetic zoneImmediate implant

Identifiers

PMID39427143
PMCPMC11491031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.