Observational studyBMC emergency medicine2024
Early prehospital mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation use for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: an observational study.
Observational study in BMC emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of in-hospital mortality risk in cardiac arrest patients using machine learning models: a study based on the MIMIC-IV database with external validation from Yunnan University Affiliated Hospital.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Impact of secondary anterior-posterior defibrillator pad placement on chest compression interruptions: a three-arm randomised manikin-based simulation study among Dutch ambulance teams.Resuscitation plus · 2025Article
- Adjusting on-scene CPR duration based on transport time interval in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a nationwide multicenter study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe use of mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation device has been very prevalent in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest rescue. This study aimed to investigate whether the timing of mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation device set-up correlated with the the outcome of cardiac arrest patients.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed adult nontrauma cardiac arrest cases in New Taipei City, Taiwan, from January to December 2022. Demographic data, intervention-related factors, and the time variables of mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation were collected. The outcomes included the return of spontaneous circulation and 24-hour survival. We compared patients who achieved spontaneous circulation and those who did not with univariate and multivariable regression analyses.
resultsIn total, 1680 patients who received mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation were included in the analysis. Reducing the time interval from manual chest compression initiation to device setup was independently associated with the return of spontaneous circulation and 24-hour survival, especially in the subgroup of patients of initial shockable rhythm. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that the outcome of patients with an initial shockable rhythm could be predicted by the mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation setup time, with areas under the curve of 60.8% and 63.9% for ROSC and 24-hour survival, respectively. The cutoff point was 395.5 s for patients with an initial shockable rhythm.
conclusionA positive correlation was found between early mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation intervention and the outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. The time between manual chest compression and device setup could predict the return of spontaneous circulation and 24-hour survival in the subgroup of patients with initially shockable rhythm with the optimal cutoff point at 395.5 s.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.