Trial reportPediatric research2025
The effects of nutrition on mesenteric oxygenation among neonates with neonatal encephalopathy: a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Expert consensus on the clinical management of therapeutic hypothermia for neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (2026)].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2026Article
- Enteral feeding timing and clinical outcomes in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy undergoing therapeutic hypothermia: a retrospective cohort study highlighting the challenge of confounding by indication.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe aimed to evaluate the effects of minimal enteral nutrition (MEN) on mesenteric blood flow and oxygenation with Doppler USG and Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) during therapeutic hypothermia (TH) in babies with HIE.
methodsThis prospective, randomized-controlled study was composed of infants receiving MEN (study group, n = 30) and infants who were not fed (control group, n = 30) during hypothermia. Infants were monitored continuously with NIRS and mesenteric blood flow velocities were measured with Doppler USG before and after feeding.
resultsThe mean gestational age and birth weight for the study and control group were 38.73 ± 1.5-39.09 ± 1.02 weeks and 3076 ± 280.4-3295 ± 391 grams, respectively. Time to reach full enteral nutrition and hospital stay were significantly shorter in the study group (p = 0.049, p = 0.016). Infants in the study group experienced less feeding intolerance (p = 0.006). No infant developed necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in both groups. No difference was determined in pre- and post-feeding cerebral rSO
conclusionIn our study, we observed that MEN during TH does not lead to a significant change in cerebral and mesenteric oxygenation. Although we did not observe an increase in blood flow and oxygenation, the absence of NEC and a lower incidence of feeding intolerance in the study group may suggest that feeding during TH is safe and feasible. IMPACT: MEN during TH treatment does not lead to a significant change in cerebral and mesenteric oxygenation. This is the first study evaluating the effects of MEN on mesenteric oxygenation and blood flow velocities in infants with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy during TH with Doppler USG and NIRS, concomitantly. MEN during TH may be safe and feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39427102What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.