Trial reportScientific reports2024
Distractor filtering and task load in working memory training in healthy older adults.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The transfer effects of executive function training on prospective memory in children with learning difficulties: a longitudinal study.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Web-based assessment of dual-task costs at different ages: an analysis across cognitive domains.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Filtering efficiency (FE) has been suggested as a task-related process of working memory (WM) in older adults, but the interaction of distractors with WM when implemented as a training to improve WM capacity is unclear. To investigate the effect of manipulations of WM and/or FE load in a multicomponent model-based WM training in improving WM capacity. 205 healthy older adults (129 women; aged 64.0 ± 8.3 years) were randomised into three WM training groups with manipulations of WM and FE load (high WM; low FE load, high WM; high FE load and low WM; high FE load). All groups underwent three online cognitive testing sessions and twelve 40-min training sessions over three weeks using the SmartBrain smartphone application. WM capacity was measured with complex span tasks and FE using the Change Detection Task. Linear mixed-effect models adjusted for age, sex, education and pre-baseline performance showed increased WM capacity post-training, but no difference between groups. While both distractors and WM are needed to improve WM in the absence of distraction, manipulations of the FE and WM load do not influence improvements following training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.