Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39427021›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

The effects of different post-activation potentiation strategies on the performance of elite female track cyclists in position 1 of team sprint.

Tianhe Li, Yapu Liang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tianhe LiSchool of Strength and Conditioning Training, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.
Yapu LiangSchool of Strength and Conditioning Training, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China. yapu_liang@bsu.edu.cn.

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities and the Chinese Universities Scientific Fund 2021QN015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study aimed to optimise post-activation potentiation (PAP) strategies for Rider 1 in elite team sprints to improve performance over 250 m (opening lap), with a focus on female cyclists. Eight national-level track cyclists participated in this study, undergoing four sets of activation strategies: control (CON), dynamic high inertia (DYN, 4 × 4 pedal strokes), isometric contraction (ISO, 4 × 4 s, 4 angles), and back squat activation (BSQ, 4 × 4 rep, 80%1RM). The tests were divided into pre-activation and post-activation phases, including measurements at 4 min, 8 min, and 12 min after activation. The tests included a 250 m time trial (TT) and segment timing, with measurements of peak torque, peak power, average power, and cadence. The mean cadence, torque, and power for the first 62.5 m of pedal revolutions were collected. Paired-sample t-tests were used to assess activation differences. Multiple group comparisons were conducted using analysis of variance (ANOVA). The Bonferroni correction was used to control Type I errors. For significant activation strategies, linear or non-linear regression was applied to extrapolate the torque-cadence and power-cadence profiles, and the parameter differences were examined to investigate profile changes. Cohen's d and Cohen's f were used as effect sizes. After DYN activation, the 250 m TT significantly improved (p = 0.018), primarily through a reduction in the 62.5 m time (p = 0.006) and an increase in peak torque (p = 0.018). After 12 min of ISO activation, the 250 m TT showed a large effect but did not reach the significance level under Bonferroni correction (p = 0.135, d = 0.860), with a notable reduction in the 62.5 m time (p = 0.003). PAP can be strategically employed to enhance the performance of elite female Rider 1 in team sprints.

Indexed as

Athletic PerformanceBicyclingAdultAthletesFemaleHumansIsometric ContractionMuscle StrengthTorqueYoung AdultKinetic and kinematics analysisPerformance analysisPosition 1Post-activation potentiationTeam sprintTrack cycling

Identifiers

PMID39427021
PMCPMC11490493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.