ArticleScientific reports2024
Generalization in perceptual learning across stimuli and tasks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Foveal crowding increases with age under limited viewing conditions.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhancing collision prediction in older adults via perceptual training in virtual reality emphasizing object expansion.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Perceptual learning, known to improve visual perception, demonstrates the plasticity of brain processes underlying vision. Early studies, using the backward-masked texture discrimination task (TDT), focused on the lack of generalizing learning to stimulus features, relating learning specificity to the selectivity of the brain networks involved in the visual task. Learning was found to be highly specific to the stimulus features, as expected from the processing selectivity found in early visual areas as well as to the task employed in training, pointing to top-down effects. More recent studies demonstrate the generalization of learning to untrained features under specifically designed training procedures. Here we suggest that transfer of learning takes place when the trained and untrained stimuli and task activate overlapping brain processes. We tested the effect of TDT learning, under conditions with and without visual adaptation, on the contrast detection (CD) of localized Gabor targets, either alone or backward masked (BM). At the TDT peripheral-target location, we found that the transfer of learning between TDT to CD and BM occurs under the TDT adaptation condition, but not under the no-adaptation condition, whereas at the TDT center-target location we found that transfer occurs for both conditions. Our results suggest that learning generalization across experimental conditions depends on overlapping neural processes within brain networks, here dominated by the inhibitory effects involved in adaptation and in spatiotemporal masking. Importantly, increased adaptation during training, due to increased stimulus consistency, enabled the transfer of learning to other tasks limited by sensory adaptation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.