ArticleScientific reports2024
Clinical safety and efficacy of elliptical thin-flap LASIK using a low-pulse energy femtosecond laser.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study assessed the clinical safety and efficacy of elliptical thin-flap LASIK with a low-pulse energy femtosecond laser in 3 thickness subgroups (85, 90, and 100 μm). A total of 80 patients who underwent bilateral LASIK surgery at Taiwan between April and September 2019 were retrospectively enrolled. Elliptical corneal flaps with wide temporal hinges and inverted-angled side cuts were created. Target flap thickness was calculated on the basis of residual stromal bed thickness and percent tissue altered. Before flap creation, an optical coherence tomography image for visualization of the precut flap position was obtained with the built-in camera. At postoperative month 1, the overall mean logMAR uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was - 0.04 ± 0.07 (20/18 Snellen), with 96% of eyes achieving UDVA of 20/20 or better. Postoperative mean manifest spherical equivalent was - 0.37 ± 0.42 D at 1 month. The visual and refractive outcomes in each of the 3 subgroups were similar. The achieved flap thicknesses were found to be highly predictable and consistent in the respective thickness subgroups. Optical coherence tomography-guided thin-flap LASIK performed with the low-pulse energy femtosecond laser was found to be safe with no intraoperative or postoperative complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.