Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39426972›Full record

ArticleNPJ biofilms and microbiomes2024

Community successional patterns and inter-kingdom interactions during granular biofilm development.

Miguel de Celis, Oskar Modin, Lucía Arregui, Frank Persson, Antonio Santos, Ignacio Belda, Britt-Marie Wilén, Raquel Liébana

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ biofilms and microbiomes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Miguel de CelisDepartment of Genetics, Physiology and Microbiology, Microbiology Unit, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain. migueldc@ica.csic.es.
Oskar ModinDivision of Water Environment Technology, Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9232-6096
Lucía ArreguiDepartment of Genetics, Physiology and Microbiology, Microbiology Unit, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8354-274X
Frank PerssonDivision of Water Environment Technology, Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0269-9375
Antonio SantosDepartment of Genetics, Physiology and Microbiology, Microbiology Unit, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1253-585X
Ignacio BeldaDepartment of Genetics, Physiology and Microbiology, Microbiology Unit, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2607-5049
Britt-Marie WilénDivision of Water Environment Technology, Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden. Britt-Marie.Wilen@chalmers.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6155-7759
Raquel LiébanaDivision of Water Environment Technology, Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden. rliebana@azti.es.

Funding

Federation of European Microbiological Societies (FEMS) FEMS-GO-2021-032Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas (Swedish Research Council Formas) 2018-01423Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas (Swedish Research Council Formas) 245-2013-627
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aerobic granular sludge is a compact and efficient biofilm process used for wastewater treatment which has received much attention and is currently being implemented worldwide. The microbial associations and their ecological implications occurring during granule development, especially those involving inter-kingdom interactions, are poorly understood. In this work, we monitored the prokaryote and eukaryote community composition and structure during the granulation of activated sludge for 343 days in a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) and investigated the influence of abiotic and biotic factors on the granule development. Sludge granulation was accomplished with low-wash-out dynamics at long settling times, allowing for the microbial communities to adapt to the SBR environmental conditions. The sludge granulation and associated changes in microbial community structure could be divided into three stages: floccular, intermediate, and granular. The eukaryotic and prokaryotic communities showed parallel successional dynamics, with three main sub-communities identified for each kingdom, dominating in each stage of sludge granulation. Although inter-kingdom interactions were shown to affect community succession during the whole experiment, during granule development random factors like the availability of settlement sites or drift acquired increasing importance. The prokaryotic community was more affected by deterministic factors, including reactor conditions, while the eukaryotic community was to a larger extent shaped by biotic interactions (including inter-kingdom interactions) and stochasticity.

Indexed as

BiofilmsBioreactorsSewageBacteriaEukaryotaMicrobial InteractionsMicrobiotaSewage

Identifiers

PMID39426972
PMCPMC11490564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.