ArticleNPJ breast cancer2024
A multi-model approach integrating whole-slide imaging and clinicopathologic features to predict breast cancer recurrence risk.
Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oncotype DX: Clinical Utility, Evidence, and Future Trends in Personalized Breast Cancer Management.International journal of cancer · 2026Review
- Pretreatment Ki67-to-ADC Ratio Predicts Prognosis in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Limits of substitution and context-dependent selective omission of Oncotype DX recurrence score testing.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Review
- Prediction of OncotypeDX recurrence score using hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole slide images.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
- The current and future landscape of AI foundation models for cancer management.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Deep learning on histopathological images to predict breast cancer recurrence risk and chemotherapy benefit: a multicentre, model development and validation study.The Lancet. Oncology · 2026Article
- How artificial intelligence applied to digital pathology could guide treatment personalization in breast cancer.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a risk prediction model of prehospital delay in patients with acute ischemic stroke.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Breast cancer recurrence risk prediction based on MIL.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Deep learning for digital pathology: A critical overview of methodological framework.Journal of pathology informatics · 2025Review
- Review
- Deep Learning on Histopathological Images to Predict Breast Cancer Recurrence Risk and Chemotherapy Benefit.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in digital pathology - time for a reality check.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy affecting women worldwide and is notable for its morphologic and biologic diversity, with varying risks of recurrence following treatment. The Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score test is an important predictive and prognostic genomic assay for estrogen receptor positive/HER2 negative breast cancer that guides therapeutic strategies; however, such tests can be expensive, delay care, and are not widely available. The aim of this study was to develop a multi-model approach integrating the analysis of whole-slide images and clinicopathologic data to predict their associated breast cancer recurrence risks and categorize these patients into two risk groups according to the predicted score: low-risk and high-risk. The proposed novel methodology uses convolutional neural networks for feature extraction and vision transformers for contextual aggregation, complemented by a logistic regression model that analyzes clinicopathologic data for classification into two risk categories. This method was trained and tested on 956 hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole-slide images of 950 ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients with corresponding clinicopathological features that had prior Oncotype DX testing. The model's performance was evaluated using an internal test set of 192 patients from Dartmouth Health and an external test set of 405 patients from the University of Chicago. The multi-model approach achieved an AUC of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.95) on the internal set and an AUC of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.78-0.89) on the external cohort for predicting low- and high-breast cancer recurrence risk categories based on the Oncotype DX recurrence score. With further validation, the proposed methodology could provide an alternative to assist clinicians in personalizing treatment for breast cancer patients and potentially improving their outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.