ArticleJornal de pediatria
Clinicogenetic characterization and response to disease-modifying therapies in spinal muscular atrophy: real-world experience from a reference center in Southern Brazil.
Article in Jornal de pediatria. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unbiased bioinformatic and clinical analysis identifies glial fibrillary acidic protein as a potential biomarker in spinal muscular atrophy.Brain communications · 2026Article
- Neonatal screening for spinal muscular atrophy: Report of a multicenter study in Brazil.Genetics and molecular biology · 2026Article
- Safety and tolerability of onasemnogene abeparvovec for patients with spinal muscular atrophy weighing ≤17 kg and ≤24 months old from OFELIA, a phase 4, open-label, multicenter, non-randomised, interventional study.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2025Article
- Use of Lung Volume Recruitment Technique in Patients With Chronic Respiratory Disease Among Brazilian Health Professionals.Pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
- Spinal muscular atrophy in Brazil: from individual treatment to global management.Jornal de pediatriaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveSpinal Muscular Atrophy linked to chromosome 5q (SMA) is an autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disease characterized by progressive proximal muscle atrophy and weakness. This study addresses the scarcity of research on novel disease-modifying therapies for SMA in Latin America by reporting a real-world experience in Southern Brazil. METHODOLOGY: This is a single-center historical cohort that included all patients diagnosed with spinal muscular atrophy at a Regional Reference Service for rare diseases.
resultsEighty-one patients were included, of whom 7 died during follow-up. Of the remaining 74 patients, 5.4 % were classified as pre-symptomatic, 24.3 % with SMA type 1, 28.4 % with type 2, 36.5 % with type 3, and 5.4 % with type 4. The mean follow-up time ranged from 1.8 years for pre-symptomatic cases to 8.7 years for SMA types 2 and 3. Approximately 42 % of these patients received specific disease-modifying therapy, of these, 96.8 % received Nusinersen, with 19.4 % transitioning to gene therapy using Onasemnogene Abeparvovec, and 6.4 % starting Risdiplam. Most patients with SMA type 1 were on disease-modifying treatment, whereas only slightly over a third of patients with type 2 and about 10 % of type 3 were receiving such treatments. Among treated patients, 80 % demonstrated improvement in motor performance during the follow-up, with a lesser therapeutic response being associated with late initiation of treatment and low motor function scores at baseline.
conclusionThis real-world study reinforces the effectiveness of disease-modifying therapies for SMA in Brazil within the context of low- and middle-income countries, which is greater the earlier and the better the patient's functional status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.