Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39426356›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanics2024

Personalizing the shoulder rhythm in a computational upper body model improves kinematic tracking in high range-of-motion arm movements.

Jennifer N Maier, Nicholas A Bianco, Carmichael F Ong, Julie Muccini, Ellen Kuhl, Scott L Delp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jennifer N MaierDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. Electronic address: jenmaier@stanford.edu.
Nicholas A BiancoDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Carmichael F OngDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Julie MucciniDepartment of Radiology, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Ellen KuhlDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Scott L DelpDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

TR&D Project 3: OpenSim for PredictionP41EB027060 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SCOTT L DELP · 2020 to 2026
$9.7M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB027060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Musculoskeletal models of the shoulder are needed to understand the mechanics of overhead motions. Existing models implementing the shoulder rhythm are generic and might not accurately represent an individual's scapular kinematics. We introduce a method to personalize the shoulder rhythm of a computational model of the upper body that defines the orientations of the clavicle and scapula based on glenohumeral joint angles. During five static calibration poses, we palpate and measure the orientation of the scapula. We explore the importance of representing shoulder elevation by introducing clavicle elevation as a degree of freedom that is independent of the glenohumeral angles. For ten subjects, we record the five calibration poses, ten additional static poses, and dynamic arm raises covering the participants' full range of motion in each body plane using optical motion capture. We examine the data using a dynamically-constrained inverse kinematics analysis. Shoulder rhythm personalization, independent clavicle elevation, and both in combination reduce the average upper body marker tracking error compared to the generic model in the static poses (26 mm to 17-20 mm) and in the dynamic trials (22 mm to 14-17 mm). Only personalization reduces the average scapula marker error (51 mm to 36-38 mm) and scapula axis-angle error (15° to 10°) compared with the palpated ground truth measurements in the static poses, and in the dynamic trials at instances that best match the static poses (53 mm to 37-40 mm, 15° to 9°). Our results show that personalizing upper body models improves kinematic tracking. We provide our experimental data, model, and methods to allow researchers to reproduce and build upon our results.

Indexed as

MovementRange of Motion, ArticularShoulderAdultArmBiomechanical PhenomenaClavicleComputer SimulationFemaleHumansMaleModels, BiologicalScapulaShoulder JointKinematicsModel personalizationShoulder

Identifiers

PMID39426356
PMCPMC13078962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.