ArticleJournal of biomechanics2024
Personalizing the shoulder rhythm in a computational upper body model improves kinematic tracking in high range-of-motion arm movements.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reproducible Research: Computational Design of Personalized Clinical Treatments for Walking Impairments Using the Neuromusculoskeletal Modeling Pipeline.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Personalization of closed-chain shoulder models yields high kinematic accuracy for multiple motions.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Musculoskeletal models of the shoulder are needed to understand the mechanics of overhead motions. Existing models implementing the shoulder rhythm are generic and might not accurately represent an individual's scapular kinematics. We introduce a method to personalize the shoulder rhythm of a computational model of the upper body that defines the orientations of the clavicle and scapula based on glenohumeral joint angles. During five static calibration poses, we palpate and measure the orientation of the scapula. We explore the importance of representing shoulder elevation by introducing clavicle elevation as a degree of freedom that is independent of the glenohumeral angles. For ten subjects, we record the five calibration poses, ten additional static poses, and dynamic arm raises covering the participants' full range of motion in each body plane using optical motion capture. We examine the data using a dynamically-constrained inverse kinematics analysis. Shoulder rhythm personalization, independent clavicle elevation, and both in combination reduce the average upper body marker tracking error compared to the generic model in the static poses (26 mm to 17-20 mm) and in the dynamic trials (22 mm to 14-17 mm). Only personalization reduces the average scapula marker error (51 mm to 36-38 mm) and scapula axis-angle error (15° to 10°) compared with the palpated ground truth measurements in the static poses, and in the dynamic trials at instances that best match the static poses (53 mm to 37-40 mm, 15° to 9°). Our results show that personalizing upper body models improves kinematic tracking. We provide our experimental data, model, and methods to allow researchers to reproduce and build upon our results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.