ArticleEpilepsia2024
Low-frequency stimulation of corpus callosum suppresses epileptiform activity in the cortex through γ-aminobutyric acid type B receptor and slow afterhyperpolarization-mediated reduction in tissue excitability.
Article in Epilepsia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bilateral detection, prediction, and lateralization of seizures using white matter.Epilepsia open · 2026Article
- Bioelectric; Neuromodulation; Epilepsy; DBS; High-frequency stimulation; Low frequency stimulation.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveDeep brain stimulation, particularly low-frequency stimulation (LFS) targeting fiber tracts, has emerged as a potential therapy for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) and for generalized epilepsy, both of which pose significant treatment challenges. LFS diffusely suppresses seizures in the cortex when applied to fiber tracts like the corpus callosum (CC). Nevertheless, the specific processes responsible for suppressing epileptic activity in the cortex induced by LFS remain unclear. This study investigates the mechanisms underlying the antiepileptic effect in the cortex of LFS of the CC in coronal rodent brain slices.
methodsAn in vitro 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) seizure model of cortical seizures was generated. LFS stimulation parameters were optimized to provide the largest antiepileptic effect in the cortex when applied to the CC. Changes to tissue excitability and percent time spent seizing were measured due to LFS in artificial cerebrospinal fluid, 4-AP, and in the presence of various specific and nonspecific γ-aminobutyric acid type B (GABA
resultsLFS significantly suppressed seizure activity in the cortex, with an optimal frequency of 5 Hz (76.5%). Tissue excitability during LFS reduces across a wide range of interstimulus intervals, with a maximum reduction at 200 ms. Notably, the tissue excitability remains depressed at 1000 ms. LFS, in the presence of GABA SIGNIFICANCE: LFS of the CC provides an antiepileptic effect in the cortex with well-understood mechanisms and could be an alternative to surgical intervention for patients suffering from DRE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.