ArticleJournal of community health2025
Prevalence of Chronic Disease and Cost Effectiveness of a Free Clinic.
Article in Journal of community health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementing a Cancer Screening Patient Registry in an Urban Student-Run Free Clinic: A Model for Preventive Care Tracking.Journal of community health · 2026Article
- Ethnic Disparities in Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy for Heart Failure: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Hispanics vs non-Hispanic Patients.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Free clinics are a widespread, yet limited research has examined the health status of people served and the cost effectiveness of free clinics. The purpose of this study was to describe the sociodemographic characteristics and prevalence of chronic conditions in patients seen at a free clinic and estimate the clinic's cost-effectiveness. The study was a retrospective chart review of 350 randomly selected paper medical charts (2009-2020) and 1,676 electronic medical records (2020-2022) at the Noor free clinic in California supported by private donors, non-profits, and foundations. Cost-effectiveness was calculated from annual clinic operating costs, services provided, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) saved, and projected savings from preventing emergency department visits. Of the 350 paper charts reviewed, 336 met inclusion criteria. Patients had an average age of 46.6 years, with most identifying as female (60%), Hispanic (69%), Spanish-speaking (62%), and employed (59%). About 64% had incomes below the federal poverty line. Chronic conditions included overweight/obesity (75%), chronic pain (46%), hypertension (28%), hyperlipidemia (24%), type 2 diabetes (24%), and mood disorders (23%). A quarter of patients had at least one chronic condition, and over half had multiple conditions. The clinic's services in 2022 resulted in an estimated 146 QALYs saved, $11.5 million in cost savings, and a return on investment of $13.18 per $1 invested. The free clinic provided medical care to low-income, Hispanic populations without insurance who historically have been disenfranchised from healthcare access. Cost-effectiveness analysis suggested that it provided significant health benefits and cost savings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.