Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39425869›Full record

ReviewCommunity mental health journal2025

Bridging the gap of Inequity in Implementation Science: Adaptations of Group EBPs for those with Serious Mental Illness in the Public Sector.

Erika R Carr

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Community mental health journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Erika R CarrDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, 34 Park St., New Haven, CT, USA. Erika.carr@yale.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5312-6147

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are many group EBPs that are now listed as effective treatments for those with serious mental illness (SMI). Despite this, there are few of these group EBPs that are being delivered consistently in the public sector, causing disparity. This article reviews the challenges that relate to implementation science and those with SMI receiving group EBPs to help them live a life of meaning as they define. The article discusses the need for adaptations of EBPs as individuals with complex concerns need different approaches to implementation science. Next, the article conveys what core constructs of group EBPs have to be maintained as they are and what elements of EBPs need adapting to empower those with SMI in engagement. This article provides knowledge of practical application of implementation science approaches while providing dialectical behavior group therapy and cognitive behavior group therapy for psychosis adaptations for those with SMI in a public sector inpatient setting.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesImplementation ScienceMental DisordersPsychotherapy, GroupPublic SectorCognitive Behavioral TherapyHumansEvidence-based practiceImplementation sciencePublic sectorSerious mental illness

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.