ArticleActa neurochirurgica2024
Intraoperative visualization of cerebral aneurysms using navigated 3D-ultrasound power-Doppler angiography.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intraoperative ultrasound for localization of a ruptured M2-M3 middle cerebral artery aneurysm with temporal hematoma: A case report.Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery · 2026Article
- The Role of Transcranial Ultrasound Imaging in Intensive Care Treatment of Decompressive Hemicraniectomy Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe questions of whether the spatial resolution of navigated 3D-ultrasound (3D-US) power-Doppler angiography imaging rendered by existing 3D-US systems is sufficient for the intraoperative visualization of cerebral aneurysms, and in what percentage of cases, are largely unanswered. A study on this topic is lacking in the literature.
methodsFrom 2015 to 2022, we performed 86 surgeries on 83 aneurysm patients. Navigated 3D-US was used at the discretion of the operating neurosurgeons when available (i.e., not being used during parallel tumor surgeries). Twenty-five aneurysms (15 ruptured) were operated on using 3D-US; 22 aneurysms were located at the middle cerebral artery (MCA). Patient 3D-US power-Doppler angiography images and surgical reports were retrospectively reviewed to assess the intraoperative ultrasound visibility of aneurysms.
resultsIn 20 patients (80%) the aneurysms were successfully visualized. In five patients (20%), the aneurysms visualization was insufficient or absent. Nineteen of 22 aneurysms (86.4%) were visualized in the MCA aneurysm subgroup. We observed no association between aneurysm visibility and aneurysm size or the presence of subarachnoid hemorrhage. In the subgroup of MCA aneurysms, no association between aneurysm visibility and the presence of subarachnoid hemorrhage was found; a trend toward poor sonographic visibility of smaller aneurysms was observed (p = 0.09).
conclusionsOur initial data show that intraoperative 3D-US power-Doppler angiography, rendered by current navigated 3D-US systems, clearly depicts the majority of aneurysms in the MCA aneurysm subgroup. However, future prospective studies performed on a higher number of aneurysms localized at various anatomic sites are needed to confirm our initial findings and determine their potential clinical relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.