ReviewInternal medicine journal2024
Phenotype of patients with late diagnosis of 22q11 deletion: a review and retrospective study.
Review in Internal medicine journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- When to consider an inborn error of immunity: clues for physicians.Internal medicine journal · 2026Review
- Multiplex Portuguese Families as a Lens into rare mutations and the Shared Genetic Architecture of Schizophrenia, Mood Disorders, and Autism Spectrum Disorders.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Management of hypoparathyroidism during pregnancy following late maternal diagnosis of DiGeorge syndrome: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11DS) is the most common microdeletion syndrome, typically presenting in neonates with congenital cardiac anomalies, hypocalcaemia and thymic hypoplasia. Some patients are diagnosed later in adolescence and adulthood, with less known about the clinical phenotype of these patients.
aimTo summarise key clinical features in cases of 22q11DS diagnosed during adolescence and adulthood.
methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study of 22q11DS patients diagnosed after 13 years of age over 2010-2021, with a literature review of published cases highlighting other late diagnoses. The study was performed in a large multicentre tertiary health network in Melbourne, Australia. Patients diagnosed with 22q11DS after the age of 13 years were included in the study. Main outcome measures were key clinical features in cases of late diagnosis of 22q11DS.
resultsA literature search yielded 53 published case reports and one cohort study for review (62 subjects). Additionally, 10 cases of late diagnosis of 22q11DS were identified through a retrospective electronic medical chart review. Findings suggest that intellectual disability and learning difficulties, hypocalcaemia with hypoparathyroidism and facial dysmorphism remain key features in patients with a late diagnosis of 22q11DS, with hypocalcaemia being the most common presentation leading to diagnosis. Patients diagnosed in adulthood may lack classical clinical features of congenital cardiac anomalies and thymic hypoplasia. Immunological consequences of 22q11DS are also an important late-onset consideration. Atypical features may include basal ganglia calcification.
conclusionsChromosome 22q11DS has diverse clinical features and a highly variable phenotype, likely contributing to underdiagnosis and later diagnoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.