Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39425612›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2025

Novel risk factors associated with retained placenta after vaginal birth.

Basel H Nasser, Jimmy E Jadaon, Nibal Awad-Khamaisy, Luna Abo Lfoul, Israel Hendler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Novel risk factors associated with retained placenta after vaginal birth.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Basel H NasserDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nazareth Hospital, Affiliated with The Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Nazareth, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5601-8571
Jimmy E JadaonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nazareth Hospital, Affiliated with The Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Nazareth, Israel.
Nibal Awad-KhamaisyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nazareth Hospital, Affiliated with The Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Nazareth, Israel.
Luna Abo LfoulDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nazareth Hospital, Affiliated with The Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Nazareth, Israel.
Israel HendlerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nazareth Hospital, Affiliated with The Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Nazareth, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate maternal and obstetric risk factors associated with retained placenta following singleton live vaginal births.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of women diagnosed with retained placenta after singleton live vaginal birth at or after 24 weeks of gestation, compared in a 1:2 ratio with women who had uncomplicated vaginal deliveries. The study and control groups were matched for maternal age, gestational age, and parity. Multivariate regression analysis assessed potential risk factors related to retained placenta.

resultsIn all, 15,260 women who delivered at our medical center(both vaginal and non-vaginal)between 2015 and 2022, 170 (1.1%) were diagnosed with retained placenta. Ninety-nine women (0.65%) who met the inclusion criteria were matched with 198 controls (1.3%). Multivariate logistic regression identified potential risk factors not previously described for retained placenta, including in vitro fertilization (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.3-11.7, P = 00.018), large-for-gestational-age fetuses (OR 28.2, 95% CI 5.4-148.5, P = 00.029), and endometriosis (OR 8.2, 95% CI 0.92-20, P = 00.024). Additional risk factors included pre-eclampsia, labor induction, vacuum-assisted delivery, and prolonged second-stage labor.

conclusionThis study identifies critical risk factors for retained placenta, highlighting the importance of early identification to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricPlacenta, RetainedAdultCase-Control StudiesEndometriosisFemaleFertilization in VitroGestational AgeHumansLabor, InducedLogistic ModelsMultivariate AnalysisPregnancyRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsYoung Adultnovel risk factorsobstetricsperinatal carepostpartum periodretained placenta

Identifiers

PMID39425612
PMCPMC11823396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.