ArticleJournal of foot and ankle research2024
An evaluation of a virtual musculoskeletal podiatry service implemented to address prolonged National Health Service waiting times.
Article in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Video-based musculoskeletal examination of the foot and ankle: a scoping review.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic had a substantial impact on healthcare systems globally, particularly in the public sector. To address the challenges posed by the pandemic, musculoskeletal (MSK) healthcare providers had to rapidly adopt virtual platforms for delivering care, representing a major shift in how healthcare was delivered.
objectiveThis manuscript aims to retrospectively evaluate a virtual MSK podiatry service offered by a private provider under a National Health Service commission, in terms of patient access, waiting times and patient-reported pain. This service was developed and implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and the extended waiting times.
methodsA retrospective clinical service evaluation was conducted on MSK podiatry services delivered via telephone or virtual consultations. The evaluation covered a cohort of 574 referred patients over a 19-month period (July 2021 to January 2023). It analysed demographic data, initial and final visual analogue pain scores, pathology categories, orthoses prescriptions and exercise rehabilitation plans.
resultsData from a total of 492 patients (male = 152 and female = 340) were analysed, with 82 patients excluded for non-attendance. The average waiting time from referral-to-first appointment and referral-to-discharge was 35 and 91 days, respectively. Results showed statistically significant improvement (p < 0.001) in the mean visual analogue scale when patients received orthoses with and without a rehabilitation plan (4.12 ± 2.55 and 3.33 ± 2.88, respectively). Most patients (61.5%) were aged 40-69, with "foot pain" being the main reported pathology category. Patients had an average of two appointments. 56.5% of patients remained virtual throughout their journey and were successfully discharged to self-management. 43.9% were discharged to other face-to face services.
conclusionsThe study provided evidence that the virtual MSK podiatry service achieved a statistically significant reduction in patient-reported pain for various pathologies with reasonable waiting times. The service delivered favourable outcomes and complemented traditional services at a time with limited access due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.