Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39425220›Full record

ArticleGlobal health research and policy2024

Challenges associated with the implementation of institutional quarantine and isolation strategies during major multicountry viral outbreaks in Africa (2000-2023): a scoping review.

Jimoh Amzat, Ebunoluwa Oduwole, Saheed Akinmayowa Lawal, Olusola Aluko-Arowolo, Rotimi Afolabi, Isaac Akinkunmi Adedeji, Ige Angela Temisan, Ayoyinka Oludiran, Kafayat Aminu, Afeez Abolarinwa Salami and 1 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Global health research and policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jimoh AmzatDepartment of Sociology, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto, Nigeria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9564-1190
Ebunoluwa OduwoleDepartment of Philosophy, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago-Iwoye, Ogun State, Nigeria.
Saheed Akinmayowa LawalDepartment of Sociology, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago-Iwoye, Ogun State, Nigeria.
Olusola Aluko-ArowoloDepartment of Sociology, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago-Iwoye, Ogun State, Nigeria.
Rotimi AfolabiDepartment of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Isaac Akinkunmi AdedejiDepartment of Sociology, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago-Iwoye, Ogun State, Nigeria.
Ige Angela TemisanDepartment of Science and Technology Education, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Ayoyinka OludiranDepartment of Sociology, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago-Iwoye, Ogun State, Nigeria.
Kafayat AminuCenter for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7438-2556
Afeez Abolarinwa SalamiFaculty of Dentistry, University of Puthisastra, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4544-0080
Kehinde Kazeem KanmodiFaculty of Dentistry, University of Puthisastra, Phnom Penh, Cambodia. kanmodikehinde@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9906-3826

Funding

TETFund NRF/HSS/GPL/00048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuarantine and isolation (Q&I) are interrelated but not mutually exclusive public health practices for disease control, which may face public resistance in the context of health emergencies due to associated challenges. Hence, it is often tough for most countries to implement Q&I even in the context of health emergencies. Therefore, this scoping review examines the challenges associated with the implementation of institutional Q&I strategies during major multicountry viral outbreaks (Ebola, Lassa and COVID-19) in Africa between 2000 and 2023.

methodsThis scoping review was designed based on Arksey and O'Malley's guidelines. A systematic literature search, using nine online research databases, was conducted with the aid of relevant search terms, Boolean operators and truncations. All articles obtained from the literature search were electronically imported into Rayyan web application for deduplication based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. From the included literature, relevant data were charted, summarized, collated, and presented.

resultsThis review included 24 of the 787 retrieved articles. Sixteen of the 24 selected articles investigated issues related to COVID-19 prevention and control in Africa. Two assessed precautionary practices for Lassa fever, while five were on Ebola virus disease. However, one article explored knowledge, preventive practices, and general isolation precautions. The review identified various challenges that hindered the implementation of successful Q&I practices during viral infection outbreaks in Africa. Essential healthcare infrastructure, equipment (medical supplies including personal protective equipment and testing kits) and facilities that are essential for Q&I were deficient. Q&I implementation was often threatened by low human resource capacity and inefficiencies in the healthcare system which portray Africa as unprepared to handle complex public health crises.

conclusionsThis review shows that Q&I implementation in Africa is often threatened by low human resource capacity and inefficiencies in the healthcare system and also portrays Africa as unprepared to handle complex public health crises. Hence, Q&I for major multicountry outbreaks in Africa is very challenging. Therefore, continuous efforts to address these identified challenges are crucial to enhancing health emergency preparedness in Africa.

Indexed as

COVID-19Disease OutbreaksQuarantineAfricaHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaHumansLassa Fever

Identifiers

PMID39425220
PMCPMC11489991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.